MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
docbook-tc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: DocBook TC action item reminder
Bob,
> c. Larry to test token string in both XSD and RNG validation.
In my notes, I had down investigating whether co-constraints expressed
in RelaxNG were correctly mapped into W3C Schemas. The minutes say I
am testing token strings. I am not familiar enough with the jargon to
understand how the two relate, so I hope I covered what I was supposed
to. I have to admit that I also used it to become more familiar with
DocBook 5 and RelaxNG.
I developed the following sample with a mixture of various constraints
on attributes and elements. Since I am new to RelaxNG, if I missed
any co-constraints, let me know and I will repeat the testing with
additional content. I have provided xml:id attributes for reference.
The sample is minus the content used to access the Schemas.
<article>
<title>Title</title>
<info>
<title>Title</title>
</info>
<para>This is a <bibliolist>
<indexterm xml:id="A" class="singular" startref="B"/>
<indexterm xml:id="B" class="startofrange" startref="A"/>
<indexterm xml:id="C" class="endofrange" startref="B"/>
<bibliomixed>
<biblioid xml:id="D" class="other" otherclass="hi"/>
<biblioid xml:id="E" otherclass="hi"/>
<biblioid xml:id="F" class="other"/>
</bibliomixed>
</bibliolist></para>
<para>This is the footnote without an admonition<footnote xml:id="G">
<para>Hi</para>
</footnote></para>
<para>This is the footnote with an admonition<footnote xml:id="H">
<caution>
<para>Hi</para>
</caution>
</footnote></para>
</article>
I consider the following to be errors:
1) No version attribute on the root element
2) title and info/title not allowed in same element
3) indexterm A should not allow a startref attribute
4) indexterm B should not allow a startref attribute
5) biblioid E should not allow otherclass (or should require
class="other")
6) biblioid F should require the attribute otherclass
7) footnote H should not allow a caution admonition
I set up two files, one referencing the RelaxNG schema and the other
the W3C XML schema. Both schemas were from the 5.0b3 download. The
tests were done using oXygen 7.0, which uses Xerces2-J for schema
validation and the Skeleton 1.5 for Schematron interpretation.
I performed five tests:
RelaxNG Validation (oXygen internal, using Xerces)
RelaxNG validation with embedded Schematron
(external, using Skeleton)
W3C XML Schema validation (oXygen internal, using Xerces)
W3C XML Schema validation with embedded Schematron
(external, using Skeleton)
Schematron validation (external, using Skeleton)
RelaxNg Validation
==================
Correctly identified error 2:
element "title" from namespace "
Correctly identified errors 3 and 4:
attribute "startref" not allowed at this point; ignored
Correctly identified errors 5 and 6 (if somewhat less helpfully):
required attributes missing
Missed (as expected) errors 1 and 7
RelaxNg Validation with Embedded Schematron
===========================================
Correctly identified all seven errors
W3C XML Schema Validation
=========================
Claimed all three indexterms were in error (although "C" was not):
Attribute 'startref' is not allowed to appear in element 'indexterm'
Failed to identify any other errors
W3C XML Schema Validation with Embedded Schematron
==================================================
Exactly the same results as "W3C XML Schema Validation," as
expected, since there are no Schematron rules embedded in the .xsd
file.
Schematron Validation
=====================
Found errors 1 and 7, as expected
Conclusions
===========
A disclaimer about the W3C Schema is appropriate. The exact wording
may require some word-smithing.
If it can be arranged, it would be preferable for the W3C schema to
allow attributes in situations that are inappropriate rather than
prohibiting them when they may be necessary.
A more thorough investigation of the differences between the W3C and
RelaxNG schemas is probably appropriate, since the current failure to
correctly map the RelaxNG into W3C schema is, at least in the case of
indexterm startref attributes makes it impossible for a file valid
according to the W3C schema to access some functionality that is bound
to the grammar.
Regards,
Larry
=======================================================================
[ Larry Rowland | If you want to build a ship, don't drum ]
[ ATCL | up the men to gather the wood, divide ]
[ Hewlett-Packard | the work, and give orders. Instead, ]
[ 3404 East Harmony Road | teach them to yearn for the vast and ]
[ Fort Collins, CO 80528 | endless sea. - Antoine de Saint Exupery ]
[ Phone: 970/898-2280 +-----------------------------------------]
[ FAX: 970/898-2188 E-Mail:larry.rowland@.hp.com ]
=======================================================================
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]