Hi Bryan, Thomas, all
I like Thomas' idea of using a wiki for this.
We could use the TC's, but it is restricted to OASIS members and hopefully some toolmakers that are not OASIS member will be willing to compile their list of extension as well.
We could use another wiki where we have more control, but I was wondering if it might be even better to use Wikipedia's XLIFF article for that list of extension. After all it's a list that could be handy for many end-users, and having it there might help us to get the input of some developers we don't know about.
Just a thought,
-ys
Original Message-----
From: bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com [mailto:bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 10:49 AM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Thomas@yamagata-europe.com
Subject: [xliff] Gathering common extension points from existing XLIFF Tools as a guide for 2.0 features
Hello TC,
I just wanted to mention, as we get ready to start the new year, that I've spoken to Thomas about the excellent suggestion he made at the symposium that we take a look at where the toolmakers are using extension points as a guide to making these standard features.
He (like most of us) is quite busy for the rest of the year, but agreed to help get us started, and to share the information he's gathered so far.
Thanks,
Bryan
---------------------
RE: XLIFF 2.0 features based on what the toolmakers are extending
Monday, December 6, 2010 5:56 AM
From:
"Thomas Vackier"