MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: AW: [ubl] To Comment "a.8" of 1.0 isses 20040721
Title: Nachricht
Hello
Mark,
I have
reviewed the documents only partially. But that what I had seen was very
confusing and not a very consistent and clean modelling approach. I does not
reflect our NDR guidelines. That is right, if we're using the Garden of Eden
approach, all elements to be qualified in the instance document. Otherwise is
the implementation of schemas into applications and the processing by this
applications not very easy.
Kind
regards,
Gunther
In reviewing the instance
documents, this problem is more widespread than just local element
declarations that are unqualified. There are some other BBIEs that are
also unqualified. NDR intended for ALL elements to be qualified in the
instance document regardless of their origin.
Mark
Hello Jon,
I said in comment "a.8" that some ag names
are prefixed by namespace prefix and others not. Sorry that was a mistake from
my side. Because I have seen now, that this schema-representation comes from
rule [ELD2] "All element declarations MUST be global with the exception of ID
and Code which MUST be local.". This requires implicitly that the local
declared element must be prefixed, if the elements are qualified (See rule
[GXS1] "UBL Schema MUST conform to the following physical layout as
applicable:").
But I have to say anyway that these rules confuse the
implementors and the users. I got many questions about this from some
colleagues. They can't understand, why the handling of elements are
different.
Kind
regards,
Gunther
To
unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]