OASIS Emergency Management TC

> For CAP:
> For example, consider the 

Sorry. You are correct. EDXL-DE not CAP. 

Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC
Sr. Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS Support Center | 
IPAWS CA / NIMS STEP
phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2025
mobile: 606.219.7882 | email: gilmoret@us.saic.com  
Please consider the environment before printing this email.




                                                

					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
                                                

                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message
                                                
                                                Original Message-----
From: Jacob Westfall [mailto:jake@jpw.biz] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:55 AM
To: Gilmore, Timothy
Cc: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [emergency] EDXL-DE 2.0 for the F2F - Objectivity,
Subjectivity and Interpretation.

> For CAP:
> For example, consider the 

It's the second comma that gets you the format is at,long radious  
(e.g. 0,0 15000000)

Thanks,
Lee


Quoting Jacob Westfall 

> It's the second comma that gets you the format is at,long radious  
> (e.g. 0,0 15000000)

The format for EDXL-DE is clearly "latitude, longitude, radius"  The example is incorrect.  It is also different than the CAP format for a circle, and any messages using the CAP format for circle in DE messages are incorrect.  The DE definition for polygon is murkier as it does not clearly define the delimiter for the lat,lon pairs and whether there is to be any space between these commas.

-- 
jake@jpw.biz
--

If Jacob is right,  DE 1.0 needs an errata even before 2.0 comes out.  The circle was meant to be the same for both specs.

On Jun 23, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jacob Westfall wrote:

>> It's the second comma that gets you the format is at,long radious  
>> (e.g. 0,0 15000000)
> 
> The format for EDXL-DE is clearly "latitude, longitude, radius"  The example is incorrect.  It is also different than the CAP format for a circle, and any messages using the CAP format for circle in DE messages are incorrect.  The DE definition for polygon is murkier as it does not clearly define the delimiter for the lat,lon pairs and whether there is to be any space between these commas.
> 
> -- 
> jake@jpw.biz
> --
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 

Gary Ham
http://grandpaham.com
703-899-6241

All,

The discussion about circles and polygons is *4.5* years old:

http://markmail.org/message/k5o7vkmqt2g2tbkk 



Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC
Sr. Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS Support Center | 
IPAWS CA / NIMS STEP
phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2025
mobile: 606.219.7882 | email: gilmoret@us.saic.com  
Please consider the environment before printing this email.




                                                

					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
                                                

                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message
                                                
                                                Original Message-----
From: Gary Ham [mailto:gham@grandpaham.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:52 AM
To: Jacob Westfall
Cc: Lee Tincher; Gilmore, Timothy; emergency@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [emergency] EDXL-DE 2.0 for the F2F - Objectivity,
Subjectivity and Interpretation.

If Jacob is right,  DE 1.0 needs an errata even before 2.0 comes out.
The circle was meant to be the same for both specs.

On Jun 23, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jacob Westfall wrote:

>> It's the second comma that gets you the format is at,long radious  
>> (e.g. 0,0 15000000)
> 
> The format for EDXL-DE is clearly "latitude, longitude, radius"  The
example is incorrect.  It is also different than the CAP format for a
circle, and any messages using the CAP format for circle in DE messages
are incorrect.  The DE definition for polygon is murkier as it does not
clearly define the delimiter for the lat,lon pairs and whether there is
to be any space between these commas.
> 
> -- 
> jake@jpw.biz
> --
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

> 

Gary Ham
http://grandpaham.com
703-899-6241