OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

Re: [office] Proposed TC Meeting Agenda Items

  • 1.  Re: [office] Proposed TC Meeting Agenda Items

    Posted 01-16-2006 18:24
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    office message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [office] Proposed TC Meeting Agenda Items


    On Jan 16, 2006, at 11:22 AM, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
    >> 1) Proposal to create additional Subcommittees
    ...
    >> c) Subcommittee formed to develop and propose further support for 
    >> Metadata and Spreadsheet Formulas.
    >> d) ODF 1.1 draft released with enhanced metadata, spreadsheet 
    >> formulas, and whatever other new features the TC may propose
    >> e) Compliance Subcommittee formed to propose ways to define compliance 
    >> and recommend and perhaps develop a means to verify compliance of 
    >> ODF-supporting applications
    
    If you don't mind, I'd like to wait to discuss formulas and how
    to handle them (including subcommittees, etc.) until AFTER the
    upcoming Monday meeting.  Technically, I'm only an "observer"
    until after next meeting, yet I'm ESPECIALLY interested in
    ensuring that spreadsheet formulas are well-defined. I'd prefer
    to legitimately be part of that discussion :-).
    
    If it's any consolation, formulas aren't standing still anyway.
    As you know, I'm leading a group ("OpenFormula") that is
    creating an early draft spec for spreadsheet formulas for
    OpenDocument. We plan to submit it to a standards body, and
    I've been having several emails with OASIS management
    about that very subject.  We've made a lot of progress, I think.
    
    Speaking of compliance tests, in the OpenFormula work,
    we've combined two problems into a solution. Our problems were:
    (1) How can you define functions well enough to really
    know what they mean, and (2) how do you get a compliance test?
    The answer, for us, has been to embed compliance tests into
    the specification itself.  I don't think this would work in
    the general case, but for spreadsheet formulas, giving specific
    required answers as part of each definition is
    turning out to be VERY useful.  Instead of dancing over
    the head of the pin of some terms, the
    test cases eliminate a VAST number of misunderstandings.
    They also let us examine what current applications do, quickly.
    
    --- David A. Wheeler
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]