OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

 View Only

AW: [ubl] To Comment "a.5" of 1.0 isses 20040721

  • 1.  AW: [ubl] To Comment "a.5" of 1.0 isses 20040721

    Posted 07-27-2004 07:25
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: AW: [ubl] To Comment "a.5" of 1.0 isses 20040721


    Hello Mavis,
    
    this is very confusing for me now. I compared the UBL 1.0 Library with the Naming and Design Rules "wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp.doc", because this is the basis for my review and not the checklist.
    
    Are this Naming and Design Rules didn't a normative part of UBL 1.0 anymore?
    
    Kind regards,
    
    	Gunther
    
    
    -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
    Von: Mavis Cournane [mailto:mcournane@cognitran.com] 
    Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juli 2004 09:14
    An: Stuhec, Gunther
    Cc: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
    Betreff: Re: [ubl] To Comment "a.5" of 1.0 isses 20040721
    
    
    Gunther
    in terms of the Documentation rules for the BBIE you are not looking at the 
    rules in the NDR checklist - these are up to date. In the checklist there is 
    no rule mandating UID - indeed, it is nolonger present. Mike Grimley and I 
    recall that we had a discussion about UID and we all decided to remove it.
    
    According to the checklist rules - Version - is optional.
    
    Regards
    Mavis
    
    > Hello Jon,
    > 
    > some clarifications to the comment a.5 (The structure of the annotations are
    > not similar to the definitions in chapter 3.7)
    > 
    > The chapter 3.7 defines the structure of annotation in rule DOC8 as
    > follows:
    > 
    > <Documentation>[Dictionary Entry Name]</Documentation>
    > 
    > Also says chapter 3.7 from rule DOC1 - DOC7, how this "Dictionary Entry
    > Names" must be represented as embedded documentation.
    > 
    > If I compare the following example to this rules, I can see some
    > differences:
    > 
    > <xsd:annotation>
    > 	<xsd:documentation>
    > 		<ccts:Component>
    > 			<ccts:ComponentType>BBIE</ccts:ComponentType>
    > 			<ccts:DictionaryEntryName>Address Line. Line.
    > Text</ccts:DictionaryEntryName>
    > 			<ccts:Definition>An address line of unstructured text intended for 
    use
    > only by systems incapable of providing structured or fully structured
    > addresses</ccts:Definition>
    > 			<ccts:Cardinality>1..7</ccts:Cardinality>
    > 			<ccts:ObjectClass>Address Line</ccts:ObjectClass>
    > 			<ccts:PropertyTerm>Line</ccts:PropertyTerm>
    > 			<ccts:RepresentationTerm>Text</ccts:RepresentationTerm>
    > 			<ccts:DataType>Text. Type</ccts:DataType>
    > 			<ccts:Examples>&quot;123 Standard Chartered Tower&quot;</ccts:
    Examples>
    > 		</ccts:Component>
    > 	</xsd:documentation>
    > </xsd:annotation>
    > 
    > The differences are:
    > 	- the element "ccts:Component" is not defined as any rule in
    > wd-ublndrsc-ndrdoc-V1pt0Draftp.doc
    > 	- the prefix "ccts" is not defined as rule.
    > 	- the BBIE needs the following information in the annotation (see rule
    > DOC4):
    > 		- Unique Identifier (mandatory) - is not represented!!!
    > 		- CategoryCode (mandatory)- is named as "ComponentType" in the example
    > above, but the code value is OK
    > 		- Dictionary Entry Name (mandatory) - OK
    > 		- Version (mandatory) - is not represented in the example above
    > 		- Definition (mandatory) - OK
    > 		- Cardinality (mandatory) - OK
    > 		- QualifierTerm (optional) - other BBIEs have the element
    > "PropertyTermQualifier", 
    > 			like (<ccts:PropertyTermQualifier>Maximum</ccts:
    PropertyTermQualifier>.
    > 		- UsageRule (optional, repetitive) - not represented in any example
    > 		- ConstraintLanguage (optional, repetitive) - not represented in any
    > example
    > 		- BusinessTerm (optional, repetitive) - other BBIE using 
    > 			<ccts:AlternativeBusinessTerms>TREM card</ccts:
    AlternativeBusinessTerms>,
    > which 
    > 			is not compliant to the CCTS, because it is defined only as
    > "BusinessTerm".
    > 		- Example (optional, repetitive) - The element name of the BBIE is
    > "Examples" (Plural)
    > 
    > Also the BBIE has additional elements defined for: "ObjectClass",
    > "PropertyTerm" and "RepresentationTerm", which are not described in rule
    > DOC4.
    > 
    > Kind regards,
    > 
    > 	Gunther
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
    > OASIS TC), go to
    > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/
    leave_workgroup.php.
    > 
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]