MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xliff message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [xliff] A minor ambiguity in the xliff spec




From: "Yves Savourel" <ysavourel@translate.com>
To: "'xliff'" <xliff@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 08:12:00 -0600






Hi Matt,
 
> I want to represent match quality as a percentage
> Do I say: 
>     match-quality="95%"
> or 
>     match-quality="95"
> Or should this not matter


I would say probably "95%". Just because there is such an
example in the spec (in the main description of alt-trans
(http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xliff/documents/xliff-
specification.htm#alt-trans).

You are right value is not really defined, we probably need
to make this more clear for interoperability.

Cheers,
-yves

________________________________

From: Matthew Lovatt [mailto:matthew.lovatt@oracle.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 3:43 AM
To: xliff
Subject: [xliff] A minor ambiguity in the xliff spec



Extract from current 1.1 spec

match-quality

Match quality - The match quality of the <alt-trans>
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xliff/documents/cs-xli
ff-core-1.1-20031031.htm#alt-trans>  element is tool
specific and can be a score expressed in percentage or an
arbitrary value (e.g. match-quality="high").

------------------------------------------------------------
----------------

I want to represent match quality as a percentage

Do I say: 

    match-quality="95%"

or 

    match-quality="95"

Or should this not matter

Mat










References:

A minor ambiguity in the xliff spec
From: "Matthew Lovatt" <matthew.lovatt@oracle.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]