OASIS eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) TC

Re: [xacml] Re: [xacml-comment] D024

  • 1.  Re: [xacml] Re: [xacml-comment] D024

    Posted 12-03-2002 12:27
     MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    xacml message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


    Subject: Re: [xacml] Re: [xacml-comment] D024


    Anne,
    In my opinion, compile-time policy type-checking is essential (although not
    normative) for the xacml implementation. If you do not have typechecking
    done you are never sure
    what is going to happen at run-time. I do not think that run-time
    type-checking is 'clean',
    I think it is 'wrong'. Static typechecker will reject policies you may find
    appropriate just
    because they pass schema validation.
    
    Simon