OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC

  • 1.  Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-23-2013 22:08
    Unfortunately I won't be able to attend the TC meeting tomorrow Jul 24. Another meeting has come up that I need to host. Thanks Makesh


  • 2.  RE: Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-24-2013 17:20
    I am assuming that this meeting is then cancelled for this week, until or unless someone says otherwise.   From: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Makesh Rao (marao) Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:08 PM To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow   Unfortunately I won't be able to attend the TC meeting tomorrow Jul 24. Another meeting has come up that I need to host.   Thanks Makesh


  • 3.  Re: [ebxml-msg] RE: Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-24-2013 17:40
    Hi Dale, and all, I hope Jacques and Theo can join today so we could discuss the pull authorization issue.  So I propose not to cancel and see if we can discuss this issue.  Groet, Sander Fieten              FIETEN IT e:  sander@fieten-it.com t:   +31 6 51507886 This email was sent from a mobile device. On 24 jul. 2013, at 19:19, Dale Moberg < dmoberg@axway.com > wrote:







    I am assuming that this meeting is then cancelled for this week, until or unless someone says otherwise.
     


    From: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    On Behalf Of Makesh Rao (marao)
    Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:08 PM
    To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow


     

    Unfortunately I won't be able to attend the TC meeting tomorrow Jul 24. Another meeting has come up that I need to host.


     


    Thanks


    Makesh







  • 4.  Re: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-24-2013 18:24
    Hi Sander, Dale I am back from travels and conferences so will make it tonight - please send the webex link as I don't have a calendar entry. On 24 Jul 2013, at 19:40 , Sander Fieten <sander@fieten-it.com> wrote: > Hi Dale, and all, > > I hope Jacques and Theo can join today so we could discuss the pull authorization issue. > So I propose not to cancel and see if we can discuss this issue. > > Groet, > > Sander Fieten FIETEN IT > > e: sander@fieten-it.com > t: +31 6 51507886 > -- Regards Theo


  • 5.  RE: [ebxml-msg] RE: Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-24-2013 18:29




    Hi all,
     
    I have another meeting today at the same time so I wouldn't be able to join.
     
    However if you are going to talk about Pull Authorization issue, I do have a question about how to authorize via digital signature. So I would like to post my question as below
    and hopefully your discussions can resolve my puzzle:
     
    Basically in an incoming Pull request there's no any information about who the pulling party is, so what's the best one to identify who the party is in order to uses the right certificate
    to authenticate and then authorize the request? The only thing I can look is the KeyInfo element in the signature, such as the certificate serial number, etc. Is it the right and reliable one to identify a pulling partner?
     
    Thanks,
    Rong
     


    From: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org]
    On Behalf Of Sander Fieten
    Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:40 AM
    To: Dale Moberg
    Cc: Makesh Rao (marao); ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] RE: Regrets for tomorrow


     

    Hi Dale, and all,


     


    I hope Jacques and Theo can join today so we could discuss the pull authorization issue. 


    So I propose not to cancel and see if we can discuss this issue. 



    Groet,

    Sander Fieten              FIETEN IT

    e:  sander@fieten-it.com
    t:   +31 6 51507886

    This email was sent from a mobile device.



    On 24 jul. 2013, at 19:19, "Dale Moberg" < dmoberg@axway.com > wrote:



    I am assuming that this meeting is then cancelled for this week, until or unless someone says otherwise.
     


    From:
    ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org ]
    On Behalf Of Makesh Rao (marao)
    Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:08 PM
    To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow


     

    Unfortunately I won't be able to attend the TC meeting tomorrow Jul 24. Another meeting has come up that I need to host.


     


    Thanks


    Makesh









  • 6.  Re: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-24-2013 19:18
    Hi Rong Seems a problem in connecting to the meeting - it goes to the one scheduled for next week. On your question - we use the MPC to which we have associated the UT. We then search the truststore with the UT name matching the alias. Hope that helps. On 24 Jul 2013, at 20:29 , Rong Xing <rxing@tibco.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have another meeting today at the same time so I wouldn't be able to join. > > However if you are going to talk about Pull Authorization issue, I do have a question about how to authorize via digital signature. So I would like to post my question as below and hopefully your discussions can resolve my puzzle: > > Basically in an incoming Pull request there's no any information about who the pulling party is, so what's the best one to identify who the party is in order to uses the right certificate to authenticate and then authorize the request? The only thing I can look is the KeyInfo element in the signature, such as the certificate serial number, etc. Is it the right and reliable one to identify a pulling partner? > > Thanks, > Rong > > From: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Sander Fieten > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:40 AM > To: Dale Moberg > Cc: Makesh Rao (marao); ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] RE: Regrets for tomorrow > > Hi Dale, and all, > > I hope Jacques and Theo can join today so we could discuss the pull authorization issue. > So I propose not to cancel and see if we can discuss this issue. > > Groet, > > Sander Fieten FIETEN IT > > e: sander@fieten-it.com > t: +31 6 51507886 > > This email was sent from a mobile device. > > On 24 jul. 2013, at 19:19, "Dale Moberg" <dmoberg@axway.com> wrote: > > I am assuming that this meeting is then cancelled for this week, until or unless someone says otherwise. > > From: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Makesh Rao (marao) > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:08 PM > To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow > > Unfortunately I won't be able to attend the TC meeting tomorrow Jul 24. Another meeting has come up that I need to host. > > Thanks > Makesh -- Regards Theo


  • 7.  RE: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-24-2013 22:55
    Theo, Thanks for answer my question. But I'm talking about using digital signature alone - no UT is used here so you cannot use UT name to search the truststore. Thanks, Rong
    Original Message


  • 8.  Re: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-25-2013 04:53
    Yep - the way I explained requires no UTs in the signal - only the digital signature. Ie. map it internally in the config. On 25 Jul 2013, at 00:54 , Rong Xing <rxing@tibco.com> wrote: > Theo, > > Thanks for answer my question. But I'm talking about using digital signature alone - no UT is used here so you cannot use UT name to search the truststore. > > Thanks, > Rong -- Regards Theo


  • 9.  Re: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-25-2013 05:37
    On 25 Jul 2013, at 06:53 , Theo Kramer <theo@flame.co.za> wrote: > Yep - the way I explained requires no UTs in the signal - only the digital signature. > > Ie. map it internally in the config. > 'it' being the MPC to the UT of course. -- Regards Theo


  • 10.  RE: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-25-2013 18:24
    Theo, Thanks for the explanation. To confirm with you, you are talking about using the MPC in the request to map to a UT, which is pre-configured. Thanks, Rong
    Original Message


  • 11.  Re: [ebxml-msg] Regrets for tomorrow

    Posted 07-26-2013 05:02
    Hi Rong Confirmed. On 25 Jul 2013, at 20:23 , Rong Xing <rxing@tibco.com> wrote: > Theo, > > Thanks for the explanation. To confirm with you, you are talking about using the MPC in the request to map to a UT, which is pre-configured. -- Regards Theo


Related Content