OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

Re: [ubl] Specialised vs. specialized

  • 1.  Re: [ubl] Specialised vs. specialized

    Posted 04-15-2004 00:46
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [ubl] Specialised vs. specialized


    [jon.bosak@sun.com:]
    
    | Unless someone can find me a British authority of equal weight to
    | the contrary (and no, I don't count something like Chambers as
    | equal to the OED), I'm going to have to change this.
    
    I just found an authority of equal weight: the Compact OED, which
    lists "specialised" as an acceptable alternative.  Not preferred,
    mind you, but OK.
    
    So I'll let our UBL TC members representing the British
    Commonwealth call it: what shall it be, Specialised or
    Specialized?  Deadline for replies is noon San Francisco time
    tomorrow (Thursday), 'cause that's when I start the next build.
    
    Jon
    
       Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
       From: jon.bosak@sun.com
    
       Folks,
    
       I've just made a truly sad discovery: a usage I thought was
       preferred British is not.  We decided a while ago to use Oxford
       English, and that means the Oxford English Dictionary.  I thought
       up till now that Oxford English meant "specialised" rather than
       "specialized."  But on checking I have just discovered that not
       only does the OED prefer "ize" to "ise" *in general*, but it does
       not even have an entry for "specialised."  And if it ain't in the
       OED, it ain't English no matter where you live.  (The form with
       the s does appear in some of the historical citations, but unlike
       "despatch," it doesn't rate a listing as a recognized alternative.
       Same with "customise," which doesn't even appear in citations.)
    
       Unless someone can find me a British authority of equal weight to
       the contrary (and no, I don't count something like Chambers as
       equal to the OED), I'm going to have to change this.
    
       Fortunately this will be a fairly straightforward task in the
       master document text, the file names, and the schemas, and I'm up
       to doing it for the build due out Friday night.  But it will
       also require changes in the following two illustrations, for which
       I do not have the original art:
    
          Figure 2
          Figure B-5
    
       Jon
    
    
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]