OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

  • 1.  OFFICE-3406

    Posted 11-04-2010 18:29
    I though that all unresolved issues are postponed to ODF-Next unless
    considered in a TC vote. OFFICE-3406 is not marked resolved but also not
    postponed to ODF-Next (although a comment by Michael indicates "As
    agreed by the TC on 2010-11-01 this issue has been moved to ODF-Next".
    
    Andreas
    


  • 2.  RE: [office] OFFICE-3406

    Posted 11-04-2010 19:40
    I think it has to do with needs-discussion.  Also, it was brought back from
    ODF-Next by Oliver when he added the (latest) proposal text.  (Show all
    instead of just comments to see the whole change history on the issue.)
    
    Also, a TC vote is being requested.
    
    There's some sort of grace period in which that works, up to next Monday, I
    believe.
    
    


  • 3.  Re: [office] OFFICE-3406

    Posted 11-05-2010 10:44
    Dear TC-members,
    
    Yes, I worked on this issue after it has been moved on Wednesday to 
    ODF-Next.
    I have included a proposal for the changed specification text on which 
    Cherie already gave her +1
    A discussion is needed to decide, if we also want to include the 
    diagrams which I have provided.
    
    I will work on the feedback provided to issue OFFICE-3406 until our TC 
    call on Monday.
    
    Best regards, Oliver.
    
    On 11/04/10 20:40, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
    > I think it has to do with needs-discussion.  Also, it was brought back from
    > ODF-Next by Oliver when he added the (latest) proposal text.  (Show all
    > instead of just comments to see the whole change history on the issue.)
    >
    > Also, a TC vote is being requested.
    >
    > There's some sort of grace period in which that works, up to next Monday, I
    > believe.
    >
    > 


  • 4.  Re: [office] OFFICE-3406

    Posted 11-05-2010 11:35
    Dear TC-members,
    
    FYI, I have adjusted the proposal of issue OFFICE-3406
    
    I am requesting a vote on the integration of the provided explaining 
    diagrams. The options are:
    - Do not integrate
    - Integrate
    -- as examples
    -- as normative text (if possible)
    
    Thx, Oliver.
    
    On 11/05/10 11:42, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Oracle 
    wrote:
    > Dear TC-members,
    >
    > Yes, I worked on this issue after it has been moved on Wednesday to
    > ODF-Next.
    > I have included a proposal for the changed specification text on which
    > Cherie already gave her +1
    > A discussion is needed to decide, if we also want to include the
    > diagrams which I have provided.
    >
    > I will work on the feedback provided to issue OFFICE-3406 until our TC
    > call on Monday.
    >
    > Best regards, Oliver.
    >
    > On 11/04/10 20:40, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
    >> I think it has to do with needs-discussion. Also, it was brought back
    >> from
    >> ODF-Next by Oliver when he added the (latest) proposal text. (Show all
    >> instead of just comments to see the whole change history on the issue.)
    >>
    >> Also, a TC vote is being requested.
    >>
    >> There's some sort of grace period in which that works, up to next
    >> Monday, I
    >> believe.
    >>
    >> 


  • 5.  Re: [office] OFFICE-3406

    Posted 11-05-2010 13:13
    Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Oracle 
    


  • 6.  Re: [office] OFFICE-3406

    Posted 11-05-2010 14:22
    On 11/05/10 14:16, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
    > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Oracle
    >