MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















emergency message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: Verify DE addresses Incident and Event




From: Art Botterell <acb@incident.com>
To: Emergency_Mgt_TC TC <emergency@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:38:51 -0400






Thanks for sparking our memories, Patti.  I think we also recognized  
that named incidents frequently merge and/or fork over time, or are  
simply re-labeled, and that even the very definition of the term  
"incident" is not altogether settled.  (And a real-time "incident  
registry" for indexing and cross-referencing incident identifiers  
might be a worthwhile project, but doesn't currently exist.)

So then do I recall correctly that we left incident ID as one of  
those optional binding values that could be asserted in a keyword?

- Art


On Jul 18, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Aymond, Patti wrote:

> If I remember the F2F correctly, we nixed the incident ID in the DE  
> because
> not all EM communication is related to an event (e.g. sensor  
> readings).
>
> Patti
>
> Patti Iles Aymond, PhD
> Senior Scientist
> Bioterrorism Preparedness & Response
>
> Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
> Managing Risk in a Complex World
>
> 8555 United Plaza Blvd.   Suite 100
> Baton Rouge, LA 70809
> (225) 952-8228 (phone)
> (225) 952-8122 (fax)
>
>