MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: [xacml] re: functions




From: Simon Godik <simon@godik.com>
To: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:41:16 -0700









Polar,
 
I agree with the approach where where ERROR in 
evaluating 'or', 'and'
is used as placeholder until 
all components are evaluated.
 
Then, if 
ERROR can be substituted with either (true, false) without changing result, 
result is returned.
If this substitution can not be made, error is 
returned.
'and': false, ERROR, true -> false
'and': true, ERROR, true -> ERROR
'or': false, ERROR, true -> false
'or' true, ERROR, true -> true
 
I'm still not sure what is the purpose of error 
functions.
If an error is raised, there is a prescription of 
what must be done
during condition evaluation and rule 
evaluation.
 
Even if we had error functions there is no syntax 
to accomodate them.
Also, what to do if error-handling function is 
raising an error, such as invalid default value etc?

Simon
 
 





Follow-Ups:

Re: [xacml] re: functions
From: Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]


  









Powered by eList eXpress LLC