OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

Dear TC Members,

Patrick and I have uploaded a series of PDF 1.2 part 1 drafts in the
last couple of days. While the upload of each draft was supplemented
with the information what has been changed, I anyway thought it may be
reasonable to summarize the changes in a single mail.


ODF 1.2 part 1 committee draft 1.0 rev 04
-----------------------------------------
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200904/msg00024.html

This draft has been prepared by Patrick. The changes that he made
compared to the previous draft are marked by change tracking information.


ODF 1.2 part 1 committee draft 1.0 rev 05
-----------------------------------------
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200904/msg00030.html

This draft equals the rev04 draft, except that the automatic generated
content has been updated, and that an error on the title page was
corrected. The automatic generated content is marked with an orange
background color. The change tracking information from the rev05 draft
has been accepted.


ODF 1.2 part 1 committee draft 1.0 rev 06
-----------------------------------------
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200904/msg00042.html

This draft equals the rev05 draft, except that the already approved
document conformance classes proposal has been integrated, and that the
contributors list was updated. The changes compared to draft 5 again are
marked using change tracking information.


ODF 1.2 part 1 committee draft 1.0 schema rev 05
------------------------------------------------
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200904/msg00031.html

This is a slightly modified schema, where empty attribute value
definitions have been replaces with an 

Hi Michael,

Thanks for putting together the summary, that's very helpful.

FYI, I've noticed a problem in the rev05 draft (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/32057/OpenDocument-v1.2-cd01-rev05.odt) that I think needs some attention.  I believe the document uses one style in a way which isn't conformant to the spec.

The date style named N106 is defined in the office:automatic-styles section of styles.xml.  It's then referenced by the footer style named "Footer" in the office:master-styles section of styles.xml, which is fine.

The style N106 is not defined in the office:automatic-styles section of content.xml, but nonetheless it is referenced in the body of the document within content.xml.  The style N106 is applied to the date of the draft which appears on the first page of the document.  Here's the markup:

  

The root of content.xml is office:document-content, of course, and the spec has the same sentence about the content of office:document-content in both Section 2.1 (Document Roots) of ODF 1.1 and Section 2.2.3.1 (

Dear TC members,

the ballot for approving below draft and schema as Committee Drafts is
closed now. The draft and the schema have been approved as Committee Drafts.

Sixteen TC members were eligible to vote. Fourteen voted
with "yes" and two abstained. This means that the necessary full 
majority that was required for approval of the draft/schema has been 
reached.

Best regards

Michael

On 04/16/09 15:23, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:
> Dear TC Members,
> 
> Committee Draft 02 Ballot Candidates
> ------------------------------------
> The candidates for a Committee Draft 2 Ballot are
> 
> ODF 1.2 part 1 committee draft 1.0 rev 06
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200904/msg00042.html
> 
> together with
> 
> ODF 1.2 part 1 committee draft 1.0 schema rev 05
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200904/msg00031.html
> 
> Out of the rev04, rev05 and rev06 drafts, the most changes have been
> made to the rev04. If you have reviewed the rev04 draft, then it is
> sufficient to review the automatic generated content in the rev05 draft
> (or some instances of it), and the few marked changes in the rev06 draft.
> 
> I suggest that we conduct a seven day e-mail ballot for
> Committee Draft 02. This would mean that we in the call on Monday would 
> agree to conduct this ballot electronically rather than having a 
> Committee Draft ballot itself. This procedure would give all of us more 
> than a week to continue the review of the drafts, and it further 
> simplifies conducting the vote. This again will allow us to spend more 
> time in the next call on public comments.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Michael
> 


-- 
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          michael.brauer@sun.com
http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
	   D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering

Great.  Next steps are for Patrick to update the text to reflect the 
status of CD02 and upload that in ODF, PDF and HTML formats.  I think we 
agreed to also notify SC34 of the availability of new CD's as well.

-Rob



From:
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg