UBL Transportation SC

  • 1.  Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 10 April 2013 00:00UTC

    Posted 04-10-2013 01:34
    MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC TELECONFERENCE WEDNESDAY 10 APRIL 2013 00:00UTC ATTENDANCE Kenneth Bengtsson G. Ken Holman (convener) Tim McGrath Andy Schoka Referred to in minutes by first name: Jon Bosak STANDING ITEMS Additions to the calendar: http://ubl.xml.org/events Review of Atlantic call minutes https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00008.html Review of Pacific call minutes https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00005.html Membership status review https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#membership https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/membership.php?wg_abbrev=ubl https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/roster.php?num_items=80 - voting status is determined by the following: - existing voting members must not miss two consecutive meetings to maintain voting status - non-voting members must attend two consecutive meetings to obtain voting status UBL 2.1 Public Review 3 - Ken H. responsible for preparing comment response document - awaiting formal TSC feedback to include for: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-comment/201303/msg00001.html - awaiting formal PSC feedback to include for: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00001.html - edits for the following feedback from Jon awaiting model changes from PSC: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00002.html UBL 2.1 Release Time-line Status of the time-line - comments received during public review 4 are accommodated in the document model and documentation by Ken H. using TSC and PSC responses - committee specification draft 4 / public review draft 4 prepared by Ken H. and submitted to TC Administration for posting/processing - TC Administration runs public review 4 for a 15-day period - comments received during public review 4 are accommodated, possibly triggering another round of working draft, committee specification draft and public review draft (but hopefully not) - if none of the comments are material, then all of the changes are clearly summarized and reported to OASIS TC Administration - at a weekly meeting we request OASIS to run a Special Majority Ballot to approve the committee specification draft as a committee specification (CS) that can be held seven days after the close of the public review) https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#committeeSpec - three statements of use are obtained - committee submits CS to OASIS as candidate standard - OASIS runs a 60-day public review - OASIS conducts a membership-wide ballot - OASIS approves UBL 2.1 as an OASIS standard ANS Status - this was announced last week, has everyone reviewed it before this week's meetings? http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/liaison-policy-ansi-addendum - Ken H. approached TC Administration for guidance - very supportive response has been received - committee discussed our preference for running the BSR-8 comment period in parallel with the OASIS 60 day membership review - Ken H. to ask TC Administration for guidance on the appropriate motions and ballots and any specification modifications required for the BSR-8 review New work product - Withholding tax - Roberto is asking to create a new project for a document he is editing that has Italian and English versions: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00009.html - for the information of TC members, Ken H. distinguished the three kinds of work products possible from the TC: - standards track - the document has a conformance clause - approval goes either to Committee Specification or all the way to an OASIS Standard - non-standards track - the document does not have a conformance clause - Committee Note - the document has numbered sections and subsections - White Paper - the document does not have numbered sections and subsections - AGREED (pending Atlantic call) to support this new work product as a Committee Note - Roberto to be asked to supply the following information: - editors of the documents - schedule of completion - which mail list will be used for open discussions - where will drafts be publicly stored (ITLSC Kavi repository or main UBL TC repository?) - Ken H. has started discussions with TC Administration for management of the process and the document templates to use DocBook for a Committee Note TC CONCALL SCHEDULE Continuing with the dates and times established late in 2012, adjusted for daylight savings time: Pacific call date/time: Wednesdays 00:00UTC Atlantic call date/time: Wednesdays 14:00UTC (Note the Pacific call takes place Tuesday evenings west of the Atlantic Ocean) Week of 2013-04-08 - regularly scheduled calls Week of 2013-04-15 - regularly scheduled calls Week of 2013-04-22 - regularly scheduled calls Week of 2013-04-29 - regularly scheduled calls 2013-09-10/12 - UBL TC Face to Face in Kars, Ontario (Ottawa airport - YOW) Will anyone be requesting a leave of absence in the near future? For privacy reasons, this discussion will be kept off of the minutes. OTHER BUSINESS None -- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal


  • 2.  RE: [ubl] Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 10 April 2013 00:00UTC

    Posted 04-10-2013 13:00
    Ken, In response to the action item on TSC I am attaching the input made by Audun and circulated on the TSC message list. Since there has been no comment or objection to this input I am submitting (attached) to the TC for consideration as the response to the comment, formally received. Regards, Andy Schoka


  • 3.  RE: [ubl] Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 10 April 2013 00:00UTC

    Posted 04-10-2013 16:16
    At 2013-04-10 08:58 -0400, Andrew M Schoka wrote: In response to the action item on TSC I am attaching the input made by Audun and circulated on the TSC message list. Since there has been no comment or objection to this input I am submitting (attached) to the TC for consideration as the response to the comment, formally received. Thank you, Andy. With your permission I will make one edit since the diagram included in the response appears to be a copy of: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/prd3-UBL-2.1/UBL-2.1.html#F-THE-INTERMODAL-FREIGHT-MANAGEMENT-PROCESS ... so I will not include the diagram in the formal response and will replace it with the above link. I do not want readers to think that the diagram in the comment response is something new. . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal


  • 4.  RE: [ubl] Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 10 April 2013 00:00UTC

    Posted 04-10-2013 13:00
      |   view attached
    Ken, In response to the action item on TSC I am attaching the input made by Audun and circulated on the TSC message list. Since there has been no comment or objection to this input I am submitting (attached) to the TC for consideration as the response to the comment, formally received. Regards, Andy Schoka