MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
wsia message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E904]
Even Lifecycle has been used in ways that confuse this (Lifecycle
discussion includes the discovery of the existence of a service) ... I
think we are trying to capture the persistence between different instances
of a Producer's service. How about:
E904
This specification SHOULD include operations and semantics related to
persisting and using stateful information by instances of the Producer's
service.
Gil Tayar
<Gil.Tayar@webcol To: Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS,
lage.com> "'wsia@lists.oasis-open.org'" <wsia@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc:
05/06/2002 08:44 Subject: RE: [wsia][wsia-requirements][E904]
AM
I agree - we have been evading this terminology issue for two long. How
about rewording to use a consensual word - "Lifecycle":
E904
This specification should include operations and semantics
related to persisting stateful information between *Producer lifecycles*.
This also pertains to E902.