Thanks, Yves, it's just a writing idiosyncrasy, your formulation makes much better sense, I will try and catch those for the next build hopefully before 6th October. Cheers dF Dr. David Filip ======================= OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, and Liaison Officer LRC CNGL CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto:
david.filip@ul.ie On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Yves Savourel <
ysavourel@enlaso.com > wrote: Hi David, all, Looking at the latest 2.1 draft here:
http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/xliff-21/xliff-core-v2.1.pdf I noticed the phrase "...it MUST be anyway Extracted using..." is used in several places in the ITS section. I think it should be "...it MUST be always represented using". The rational: - I think "anyway" is probably a typo. - And using "Extracted" seems to assume using the ITS annotation is part of the extraction. But it's not: it can be done at any time. Cheers, -yves --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php