OASIS DocBook TC2

DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 18 November 2009

  • 1.  DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 18 November 2009

    Posted 11-19-2009 18:00
    DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 18 November 2009
    =============================================================
    
    The DocBook Technical Committee met on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 at
    01:00p EDT (10:00a PDT, 17:00GMT, 18:00BST, 19:00CEST, 02:00JST+,
    022:30p India+) for 60 minutes.
    
    1. Roll call
    
    Present: Patricia Gee, Paul Grosso, Dick Hamilton, 
    Scott Hudson, Gershon Joseph, Jirka Kosek, Larry Rowland,
    Bob Stayton, Norm Walsh.  We have a quorum.
    
    Absent: Chris Chung, Jim Earley, Keith Falhgren, Nancy Harrison,
    Corey Leong, Dave Pawson, John Pederson, Pine Zhang
    
    2. Accepted the minutes [1] of the previous meeting.
    
    3. Next meeting: 16 December 2009
    
    4. Review of the agenda.
    
    Add item 11a regarding DocBook website maintenance.
    
    5. Review of open action items
    
      a. Norm to put the new backwards compatibility policy in the spec.
      COMPLETED.
    
      b. Norm to put the new backwards compatibility policy in the
         reference documentation.
      COMPLETED.
    
      c. Norm to take a look at the inlines and make a proposal
         regarding RFE 2791288.
      COMPLETED.
    
      d. Norm to reply to RFE 2820947 (transclusion) with the
         committee's concerns (see the minutes).
      COMPLETED.
    
      e. Gershon to develop a reltable example.
      CONTINUED.
    
    
    6.  DocBook 5.0 standards celebration.
    
    DocBook 5.0 was approved as an OASIS Standard.  Congratulations 
    to all involved.  [Pop goes the virtual champagne cork]
    
    7.  New edition of DocBook: The Definitive Guide 
    
    Dick reports that they are close to doing a technical review,
    and he will solicit technical reviewers.
    
    8.  Publishing Subcommittee report.
    
    Scott reports that they are still having problems deriving a
    DTD from the RelaxNG for the publishing schema.
    This technical glitch is holding up the process, and he
    may have to resort to creating it by hand.
    
    9.  eLearning Subcommittee report.
    
    Scott is organizing an initial meeting for 8 December at 
    10am EST.  They will meet the 2nd Tuesday of each month.
    
    10. DocBook assembly schema.
    
    No further changes have been suggested. Members said they
    would try out the prototype stylesheets that Bob provided
    that convert between a DocBook document and an assembly
    with topics.
    
    ACTION: Larry will publish an updated schema with last month's
    changes.
    
    Norm suggested that we make available both full and simplified
    versions.  He is concerned that the details of the full
    version will overwhelm those getting started who need
    just basic assembly.  It may be separate schemas, or
    just documentation and examples.
    
    ACTION: Norm to prepare a proposal for full and simplified
    assembly versions.
    
    Bob proposed adding a relatedlink element to DocBook 5. [2]
    This could complement related links managed at the
    assembly level.  Members were generally favorable, but
    no action was taken yet.
    
    Bob suggested organizing a separate discussion of
    linking in modular DocBook, and several members
    expressed interest.
    
    ACTION: Bob to organize a meeting to discuss linking
    in modular DocBook.
    
    11. topic element (RFE #2820190).
    
    No further discussion at this time.
    
    11a. DocBook websites.
    We have received feedback on the docbook mailing lists
    that the number and organization of DocBook websites is
    a bit confusing.
    
    ACTION: Norm to develop a proposal for maintaining
    the DocBook websites.
    
    12.  Review of Requests for Enhancement
    
        To browse a specific RFE, enter the URL (on one line):
    
          http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&
          group_id=21935&atid=384107&aid=XXXX
    
        RFEs to revisit for 6.0
          1907003  biblioid content model too broad  
    
        RFEs to be considered 
          1679665  Add better support for modular documentation  
    
    This is covered under agenda item 10.
    
          2770858  Add limited emphasis to ubiquitous inlines 
          2791288  add quote to corpauthor and gui elements 
    
    Norm looked at these two items together. He agrees that since
    quote characters are permitted everywhere, the quote element
    should also since it can generate quote characters suitable
    to each locale.  Norm suggested allowing the elements defined
    in this DocBook RelaxNG pattern to appear almost everywhere:
    
    db.publishing.inlines =
      (db.abbrev
       | db.acronym
       | db.date
       | db.emphasis
       | db.footnote
       | db.footnoteref
       | db.foreignphrase
       | db.phrase
       | db.quote
       | db.subscript
       | db.superscript
       | db.wordasword)
      | db.glossary.inlines
      | db.coref
    
    He suggests using other alternate patterns as needed to prevent
    nested use of inappropriate elements.  There were no
    objections.
    
    ACTION: Norm to develop schema changes for discussion at
    the next meeting.
    
          2820190  add a topic element  
    
    Pending.
    
          2820947  Ability to transclude text 
    
    At the August 2009 meeting [3], the committee suggested that
    this feature be developed as an XML standard rather than a DocBook
    feature.  Members now don't feel this is likely to solve the 
    problems users have expressed.  Members have suggested that
    XInclude is not sufficient, conref is too complicated, but the
    needs persist.
    
    ACTION: Norm to develop a list of use cases and requirements
    for transclusion.
    
    ACTION: Bob to add agenda item for this RFE to next meeting.
    
          2821653  indexterms in footnotes 
    
    Bob had reported that indexterms in footnotes work in XSLT.
    We thought we approved allowing indexterms in footnotes at
    the last meeting, but it was not recorded in the minutes,
    so it is considered not approved yet.  We will reconsider
    at the next meeting.  Paul suggested that this needs
    better documentation.
    
    ACTION: Norm to better document indexterm placement.
    
    -----
    
    [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-tc/200910/msg00022.html
    [2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-tc/200911/msg00003.html
    [3] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-tc/200908/msg00004.html
    
    Bob Stayton
    Sagehill Enterprises
    bobs@sagehill.net