I believe we have a rule about this, but it's very vague and just talks
about reflecting the "business process". If it makes sense, we could
get more specific (but if we recommend a tripartite name with dots,
people might confuse it with CC names! :-).
Eve
Stuhec, Gunther wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a question to the naming conventions of the name of business
> documents�.
>
> Every name of business documents exists of three parts:
>
> - Object: PurchaseOrder, Invoice, DeliverySchedule, etc.
> - Method: Transfer, Create, Update, Delete
> - Activity: Notification, Query, Response, Collaboration,
> Negotiation, Request, Confirmation
>
> How can we assembly this three parts in names business documents? Like:
> "Create. Delivery. Notification"
> Is the name of the generic header the same as the name of the business
> document?
> Do some rules existing now? Do we assembling like that: Method. Object.
> Acitivity?
> Should we use for the activity verbs or nouns?
> Are the terms "Object", "Method" and "Ativity" enough or too much?
> Do you have another suggestions?
>
> It would be very glad, if you can help me.
> Thank you very much.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Gunther
>
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>