OASIS Charter Submission Discuss

  • 1.  Proposed Charter for OASIS Identity in the Clouds TC

    Posted 02-21-2010 22:31
    Greetings!
    
    The original charter for this TC appears at: 
    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oasis-charter-discuss/201001/msg00000.html 
    and my original comments: 
    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oasis-charter-discuss/201001/msg00003.html.
    
    To its credit, the charter now has support from both IBM and Microsoft, 
    so we are only missing Amazon, Google and Oracle, to name a few of the 
    other major players in *cloud* computing.
    
    Remaining/recurrent issues include (I haven't tried to be exhaustive):
    
    1) OASIS TC proposals should not invent confusing terminology in any 
    standards area. For example, there isn't any "Identity in the Clouds" 
    technical effort anywhere in known space. There are standards being 
    developed for *cloud* computing and questions of identity in the *cloud.*
    
    The name of this TC and its charter are noise pollution in an important 
    area of computing.
    
    2) OASIS TC proposals should propose the development of *standards* to 
    address known issues. It is inappropriate to propose a charter with no 
    known purpose or target for its effort, other than to go "gap hunting" 
    through other standards efforts. From the description in the charter, it 
    bears a strong resemblance to a "snipe hunt." (On which see: 
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snipe_hunt)
    
    3) An OASIS TC isn't necessary to find and communicate "gaps" noticed in 
    Identity Management protocols. Email to the authors of those protocols 
    would suffice.
    
    4) Unless other standards efforts have designated the proposed TC as the 
    arbiter of terms and their definitions, the goal to "harmonize 
    definitions/terminologies/vocabulary of Identity in the context of Cloud 
    Computing" seems unlikely to be successful. Particularly since this 
    effort starts with fanciful invention of terms in the area.
    
    Let's cut to the chase. This is a TC to go hunting for a standard or 
    perhaps not, to write.
    
    Why not develop one or more use cases that illustrate a gap in existing 
    standards, create or have a proposal to create a standard or profile to 
    address that gap and then form a TC?
    
    What is so hard about that?
    
    It would have a defined scope, a meaningful description of a projected 
    work product, a description that could entice others into joining the 
    work, a place to fit into the larger panoply of standards in the area, 
    in short all the things one expects of a standards TC and its work product.
    
    As I said in my original comments, this is an *important* area of 
    computing. It is an area where OASIS should be encouraging the formation 
    of *useful* TCs to address known issues. Forming TCs to go "gap hunting" 
    in existing or new areas of computing technology does not reflect well 
    on OASIS and by extension its members.
    
    Let's not embarrass ourselves by forming a TC that has no clear purpose 
    or goal.
    
    Hope everyone is at the start of a great week!
    
    Patrick
    
    PS: I am a member of the OASIS Technical Advisory Board (TAB) but this 
    posting does not reflect any official view of the TAB or OASIS.
    
    -- 
    Patrick Durusau
    patrick@durusau.net
    Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
    Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
    Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
    Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
    
    


  • 2.  RE: [oasis-charter-discuss] Proposed Charter for OASIS Identity in the Clouds TC

    Posted 02-21-2010 22:52
    Co-Chair of OASIS PLCS TC concurs.
    
    Development of standards needs to be done against one or more use cases.
    These cases can then be used to promote the solutions as solving actual
    problems.  The US and European aerosapce and defence industries use a
    similar approach when selecting standards for industry-wide recommended
    adoption - I co-chair the standards strategy groups in both trade
    associations and would welcome a clear proposal for action, especially
    taken into consideration against major existing efforts such as TSCP
    (Transglobal Secure Collaboration Program) 
    
    
    Howard Mason
    Corporate IT Office
    Tel: +44 1252 383129
    Mob: +44 780 171 3340
    Eml: howard.mason@baesystems.com
    BAE Systems plc
    Registered Office: 6 Carlton Gardens, London, SW1Y 5AD, UK
    Registered in England & Wales No: 1470151 
    
    


  • 3.  RE: [oasis-charter-discuss] Proposed Charter for OASIS Identity inthe Clouds TC

    Posted 02-22-2010 08:35
    [Thread Hijack follows]
    
    Several comments on the WS-Calendar webinar last Friday suggested the applicability of that standard to Manufacturing and to managing delivery of resources across manufacturing operations. It was suggested that we actively recruit such perspectives onto the team, as well as actively seek an expansion of use cases from this area.
    
    Can you offer any help?
    
    tc
    
    
    "If flies are allowed to vote, how meaningful would a poll on what to have for dinner be, and what would be on the menu?" -  Unknown
    
    Toby Considine
    Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee
    Co-Chair, OASIS Technical Advisory Board
    Facilities Technology Office
    University of North Carolina
    Chapel Hill, NC
      
    Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu
    Phone: (919)962-9073 
    http://www.oasis-open.org 
    blog: www.NewDaedalus.com
    
    
    
    


  • 4.  Re: [oasis-charter-discuss] Proposed Charter for OASIS Identity inthe Clouds TC

    Posted 02-22-2010 18:28
      |   view attached