MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ebxml-msg message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] some issues affecting header design




From: Doug Bunting <Doug.Bunting@Sun.COM>
To: Jacques Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:28:37 -0700






I meant RM-Reply as defined in the WS-Reliability 1.1 specification.

On 20-Sep-04 16:25, Jacques Durand wrote:

> Doug:
> 
> Let me try to cut short on commenting on a previous unclear comment..:
> I believe we'll need an ebMS message ID in addition to the RM ID,
> even if an implementation could weasel its way out - which I am not even 
> sure yet.
> 
> My turn to be puzzled by your fisrt paragraph below:
> Because RM-Replies are only visible to RMPs and are correlated by these 
> to reqeust(s) based on RM IDs.
> I guess by RM-Reply you mean [business] response that uses "response" 
> reply pattern?
> So the use of RefToMessageId seems rather orthogonal to this - it would 
> allow for correlating in ebMS
> where RM headers are no longer visible.
> 
> Jacques
> 
> 
> 
>