UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

  • 1.  Rule: 16

    Posted 07-21-2003 17:18
    I am going back through Rules already discussed and building a status list.
    The following rules, that I am sending out are all commented on, but not
    decided.  Though the comments are not always for or against, mostly
    editorial.  So, same rules apply.  You have 5 working days, which actually
    puts us in Montreal.
    
    Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
    mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
    membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
    the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
    be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
    
    Voting period on this rule ends:  July 28, 2003
    
    *******************************
    [R 16]  For every complex type definition based on an object class, its
    content model must be defined such that it reflects each property of the
    object class as an element declaration, with its cardinality and positioning
    within the content model determined by the details of the syntax-neutral
    model.
    
    
    Our Comments:
    
    Group together like rules, Complex-types together, elements together.
    
    
    
    Syntax-neutral model is not enough information, we need a better way to
    reference this
    
    
    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
    
    
    BEGIN:VCARD
    VERSION:2.1
    N:Seaburg;Lisa
    FN:Lisa Seaburg (E-mail)
    ORG:Aeon LLC
    TEL;WORK;VOICE:(662) 562-7676
    ADR;WORK:;;;Senatobia;MS;38668;USA
    LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Senatobia, MS 38668=0D=0AUSA
    URL;WORK:http://www.aeon-llc.com
    EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:lseaburg@aeon-llc.com
    REV:20030721T171645Z
    END:VCARD