1. There has been no feedback on ODF 1.1 Errata 01 WD05 so far. I am hoping that WG6 will verify the changes made to WD04 items based on review there. 2. Chet Ensign and I will work out the template and boilerplate document to use for WD06 this week. The idea is to use a form that will satisfy the OASIS Production process and be a potential candidate for CSD01. (Errata follow the Committee Specification track.) 3. At the ODF TC, there are JIRA issues to review and provide concurrence on (unanimous consent being a possibility). The list of all issues is in a catalog issue, OFFICE-3514: <
https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3514 >. 4. I have marked three issues with "REVIEW-REQUESTED" in their titles. I request that these be reviewed between the 2013-01-21 meeting and the subsequent 2013-02-04 meeting: * OFFICE-3369: <chart:title> error in ODF 1.0/1.1 <
https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3369 > * OFFICE-3815: ODF 1.1 9.5.3 Enhanced Path Definition <
https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3815 > * OFFICE-3818: ODF 1.1 9.5.3 contradictory draw:text-areas definition <
https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3818 > 5. In addition, one of the ODF 1.1 Errata JIRA issues has received a comment: * OFFICE-3810: ODF 1.1 Section 15.5.20 grammar correction <
https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3810 > It would be valuable to bring that to a conclusion by the 2013-02-04 call as well. - Dennis