I was on vacation during last meeting. I reviewed the meeting notes and have a question. I see the following note: 1. Basic vocabulary (p 43) (Aoyama-san) - Investigated vocabularies in others standards. Aoyama-san: Based on the results, want to keep the current vocabularies. Kamimura-san: Don?t we have conflict with EMS vocabularies? Yabuta-san: Our vocabularies are based on standard like ISO and PMBOK. If there are conflicts, EMS may need to be fixed. I would like to discuss the comment of Yabuta-san. ISO and PMBOK do not define RDF vocabularies. What aspect of OSLC EMS is in conflict with ISO or PMBOK? Please provide a reference that I can review. As far as I can tell, PROMCODE has renamed some terms from EMS. I have created an issue to track this [1]. I hope we can discuss this on Jan. 6. Thanks. [1]
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCPROMCO-11 _________________________________________________________ Arthur Ryman Chief Data Officer SWG Rational 905.413.3077 (phone) 416.939.5063 (cell) IBM InterConnect 2015 From: Yoshio Horiuchi <
hoy@jp.ibm.com> To:
oslc-promcode@lists.oasis-open.org Date: 12/24/2014 12:54 AM Subject: [oslc-promcode] Groups - meeting-note-12242014.doc uploaded Sent by: <
oslc-promcode@lists.oasis-open.org> Document Name: meeting-note-12242014.doc No description provided. Download Latest Revision Public Download Link Submitter: Mr. Yoshio Horiuchi Group: OASIS OSLC Lifecycle Integration for Project Management of Contracted Delivery (OSLC PROMCODE) TC Folder: Meeting Notes Date submitted: 2014-12-23 21:54:12