MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
emergency message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword to contentObject
Title: Re: [emergency] FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword to contentObject
O.K. I'm going to assume that
I misunderstood and change it to meet Rex's description prior to the meeting
tomorrow. This will be a change to the DOM, Data Dictionary, and schema. Please,
please, please check to make sure that I don't get them out of
sync.
Patti
From: Renato Iannella
[mailto:renato@nicta.com.au]
Sent: Mon 1/30/2006 5:42 PM
To:
Rex Brooks; Emergency_Mgt_TC TC
Cc: Tim Grapes; Aymond, Patti; Lee
Tincher
Subject: Re: [emergency] FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword
to contentObject
On 31 Jan 2006, at 08:06, Rex Brooks wrote:
> Excuse
me, Please, if my memory has turned to swiss cheese, but I
> would
have sworn we agreed that EDXL-DE could have multiple
>
contentObjects with one and only one payload each, and one and
only
> one DistributionType, so that no contentObjects could be of a
type
> different than the DistributionType.
That is my
recollection as well....
Cheers... Renato Iannella
National ICT
Australia
(NICTA)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This
email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain
legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read,
copy,
use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an
intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete
both
messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer
virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or
unauthorised
amendment. This notice should not be
removed.
IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE:
http://www.ieminc.com/e_mail_confidentiality_notice.html
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]