UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Containership issue with current LCSC samples

  • 1.  RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Containership issue with current LCSC samples

    Posted 03-07-2003 18:58
    Bill:
    
    Please see the write-up I just sent out regarding this issue. I do believe
    that usability is a major issue here, both in terms of the understandability
    of the document structures and that of OO code used to process those
    structures (the encapsulation argument).
    
    What I'd like to know is why, with a couple of simple changes, we could
    optimize for performance and usability *without impacting LCSC at all) we
    don't do it. The lack of resources is not a good argument here, especially
    when you sconsider what our extended documents look like. What are the
    design criteria that account for the current design? Mostly, they are based
    on normalization which has, I will admit, been successful in all but the two
    limited cases I'm addressing - it produces an algorhithmic consistency where
    before there was no solid basis for such consistency. I like it. But it has
    a couple of small problems...
    
    Anyway, it's all in the write-up...
    
    Cheers,
    
    Arofan