OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC

RE: [ebxml-bp] Re: [ebsoa] Re: [ebxml-bp] Closing the gap between MSI and BSI and move on

  • 1.  RE: [ebxml-bp] Re: [ebsoa] Re: [ebxml-bp] Closing the gap between MSI and BSI and move on

    Posted 02-04-2005 21:19
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ebxml-msg message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [ebxml-bp] Re: [ebsoa] Re: [ebxml-bp] Closing the gap between MSI and BSI and move on


    Hi Duane,
    
    It seems a bit confusing to me to say that something that implements an
    interface cannot use the name of the interface when indicating what
    interface it is implementing.
    
    E.g., java classes implement interfaces and use the name of the
    interface to indicate the interface(s) so implemented. 
    
    Puzzled what your point is. Too abstruse for me. Not going to worry
    about it unless you clearly explain the badness. 
    
    If there is a gap, I guess it means that there needs to be a realignment
    of the outgrown 1.04 draft with what is going on. Too bad we don't have
    a replacement yet :-)
    
    Dale