UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 93 Processing Instructions

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 93 Processing Instructions

    Posted 07-17-2003 01:43
    I could be a little ignorant on the rationale here.
    I'm neither strongly for or against this rule.
    
    But SOAP folks have gone through 1.1 prohibiting it,
    then after implementations, have changed their mind
    to allow for PIs to be in.  
    
    Should we relook at what new insights have been acquired
    by them before prohibiting PIs?
    
    
    Best Regards,
    Chin Chee-Kai
    SoftML
    Tel: +65-6820-2979
    Fax: +65-6743-7875
    Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
    http://SoftML.Net/
    
    
    On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
    
    >>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
    >>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
    >>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
    >>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
    >>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
    >>
    >>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
    >>
    >>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 22, 2003
    >>
    >>*******************************
    >>[R 93]  Processing Instructions MUST NOT be used.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>ATG Decision:  ACCEPTED.
    >>
    >>
    >>---
    >>
    >>File has not been scanned
    >>
    >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    >>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003