Hello,
Good discussion. I think:
> For XLIFF 2.0, do we need to have two segmentation models as we have now in XLIFF 1.2?
. . . is the question that should perhaps end up on next meeting's agenda. This, and questions like it, are good lead in to the request I made that we start to think about getting back into "general XLIFF 2.0" mode after we wrap up the text scope/requirements work we've been doing for the past 6 months, or so.
Thanks,
Bryan
________________________________________
From: Rodolfo M. Raya [rmraya@maxprograms.com]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 6:56 AM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff] Translating XLIFF 1.2
>
Original Message-----
> From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@translate.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 12:26 PM
> To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xliff] Translating XLIFF 1.2
>
> >>> Is the use of