MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: Summary: How others handle minor version URIs
Oops, missed some input from Mark Baker regarding W3C schema
efforts. In a message apparently intended for the ubl-dev list
but for some reason not archived there, he wrote:
FYI, XHTML 1.0 and 1.1 used the same namespace, while XHTML 2.0
used a new one. Also, SVG 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 shared the same
namespace. Off the top of my head, I can't think of any W3C
XML based format spec which changed the namespace on a minor
version rev.
Revised list below.
Jon
==================================================================
Group 1a: Changes the namespace for minor versions
RosettaNet (electronics)
MDDL and FpML (financial)
Group 1b: Changes the namespace for minor versions, but not with
good results
Grants.gov (government grants)
SEMATECH (manufacturing)
Group 2a: Keeps the namespace the same for minor versions
OAGIS (automotive and aerospace)
XHTML (WWW)
SVG (vector graphics)
Most (if not all) of the other W3C XML schemas
Group 2b: Keeps the namespace the same, but maintains version info
in a revision attribute
STAR (automotive)
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]