OASIS Emergency Management TC

Re: [emergency] EM TC 04-03-03 Meeting Minutes

  • 1.  Re: [emergency] EM TC 04-03-03 Meeting Minutes

    Posted 04-10-2003 13:19
    Hi Eliot, Everyone,
    
    I think that the wisest way to approach this touchy situation is to 
    address it to a human decision-maker, i.e. "Dear Colleague:..." and 
    write it in plain English, with the attachment also framed as an 
    explanation with code to illustrate what is said.  The hypothetical 
    human decision-maker actually exists somewhere along the line, so 
    making the effort to show some human consideration is likely to 
    create a friendlier and more receptive response.
    
    I worry that anyone who is sent a message that is primarily code will 
    probably not take the time to identify and understand the problem. I 
    wouldn't if I didn't have plenty of time to spare for this.
    
    As it is, I still don't have a good idea of why what DHS has done is 
    in error and I don't have the time to uncover the problem on my own. 
    The attachment makes good sense, but without knowledge of why it is 
    needed, I can't form an opinion about the importance of the change it 
    suggests.
    
    So, I think it would be politic and diplomatic to briefly explain why 
    a change would be to everyone's benefit and offer the remedy.
    
    Ciao,
    Rex
    
    >Hi Cathy
    >
    >At 08:51 AM 4/8/2003 -0700, you wrote:
    >
    >>EM TC Face-to-Face Meeting Minutes
    >>April 3rd, 2003
    >>Arlington, VA
    >>[...]
    >>    * [...] Rick noted that this was similar to what he wanted to do 
    >>but still needed to be flushed out.
    >I think you mean "fleshed out" rather than "flushed out"
    >
    >>[...]
    >>Conclusion: SC needs to create advisory note to groups that are 
    >>already working on this to tell them what we are doing and advise 
    >>them to wait.
    >
    >The conclusion was to tell them what we are doing and what we
    >advise as to the message format. Given that they had already
    >acted, it does not make sense that we would ask them to wait.
    >
    >BTW, the gist of the advice I'd recommend is illustrated in
    >the attached Web page.
    >
    >>[...]
    >>Action Items
    >>    * Eliot/Rex - draft Advisory Note for vote by TC
    >My understanding is that the TC vote was on whether to send an
    >Advisory Note and that vote carried without objection. We would
    >expect the Advisory Note content to be a provided by the chair
    >of the Notifications SC, it seems to me.
    >
    >Attachment converted: Enterprise:hsas.html (TEXT/MSIE) (0025E359)
    
    
    -- 
    Rex Brooks
    GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
    W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
    Email: rexb@starbourne.com
    Tel: 510-849-2309
    Fax: By Request