UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 94 Nil - Duplicate

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 94 Nil - Duplicate

    Posted 07-15-2003 14:56
    Amendment Required because prohibiting xsd:nil does NOT
    equate with prohibiting empty content element.
    
    Suggested change:
    
    [R 94]: The nillable attribute MUST NOT be used.
            Empty content element MUST NOT be instantiated
            UNLESS it is expressly a user-intended indication
            to instantiate empty content for a given element.
    
    
    Best Regards,
    Chin Chee-Kai
    SoftML
    Tel: +65-6820-2979
    Fax: +65-6743-7875
    Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
    http://SoftML.Net/
    
    
    On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
    
    >>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
    >>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
    >>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
    >>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
    >>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
    >>
    >>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
    >>
    >>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 22, 2003
    >>
    >>*******************************
    >>[R 94]  The nillable attribute MUST NOT be used
    >>
    >>Note:  Duplicate.  See Rule 32.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>---
    >>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    >>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003