Hi Patrick, Just a slight change of idea, the default name when being cloned would be "odf", perhaps "odf-tc" would be more correct out-of-box:
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/odf-tc But now as we hit the first major problem (naming things), we might as well wait a few days to get some feedback from the others. Best regards, Svante Am Mi., 27. Mai 2020 um 23:48 Uhr schrieb Svante Schubert <
svante.schubert@gmail.com >: Yes, we do not have as many artefacts/files as other prominent GitHub projects (e.g.
https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/ ) and we would have all our tooling and artefacts in a single box. My 2 cents, Svante Am Mi., 27. Mai 2020 um 23:36 Uhr schrieb Patrick Durusau <
patrick@durusau.net >: Svante, So you're saying no separate repositories for ODF projects, just one repository with divisions under it? (Just to be clear, works for me but since they offer confusion of sub-divisions I thought I should ask.) Patrick On 5/27/20 5:33 PM, Svante Schubert wrote: Hi Patrick, I looked at the existing OASIS TCs:
https://github.com/oasis-tcs How about the shortest version:
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/odf Best regards, Svante PS: Sorry, for prods, sitting home all the time due to Corona get me sometimes into moods. Am Mi., 27. Mai 2020 um 23:25 Uhr schrieb Patrick Durusau <
patrick@durusau.net >: Svante, With your gentle prods I'm filling out the request for a github instance but the name of the repository gives me pause: First part (madatory): odf Followed by a hypen "-" then further specification of a part Should we have: -1.4 (with subparts inside 1.4 for the parts and schemas and other documents) or -1.4-1 (I'm assuming periods are allowed in names but that's a guess on my part, may have to replace periods with hyphens) Paul? etc. Or some other organization of parts? Hope you are having a great week! Patrick PS: As soon as we solve the naming issue, I can submit the required request. On 5/27/20 5:07 PM, Svante Schubert wrote: Hi Paul, did you create the HTML ODF files as Francis assumed? I am looking for the XSLT being used, to compare it with my old ones to fix some regressions. Furthermore, the TC decided to enable a TC GitHub to have a better programmatic access to our files and enable automated regression tests. What would be the next steps? Thanks in advance, Svante ---------- Forwarded message --------- Von: Francis Cave <
francis@franciscave.com > Date: Mi., 27. Mai 2020 um 22:57 Uhr Subject: RE: [office] Re: URL to the XSLT being used to transform ODT 1.3 to HTML specification To: Svante Schubert <
svante.schubert@gmail.com >, Patrick Durusau <
patrick@durusau.net > Cc: <
office@lists.oasis-open.org > Hi Svante Sorry you haven t had a response to your posting of 14 May. I presume that you re referring to CS01. I had no hand in preparing this HTML, so my guess is certainly no better than yours, but looking at the source of the HTML (it s XHTML) I d say that it was all definitely converted using the XSLT built into LibreOffice, since I see the following comment at the top of each Part: <!--This file was converted to xhtml by LibreOffice - see
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/filter/source/xslt for the code.--> My guess is that Paul Knight at OASIS generated the XHTML in LibreOffice rather than by running the XSLT separately, but Patrick may know differently. Kind regards, Francis From:
office@lists.oasis-open.org <
office@lists.oasis-open.org > On Behalf Of Svante Schubert Sent: 27 May 2020 18:59 To: Patrick Durusau <
patrick@durusau.net >; Francis Cave <
francis@franciscave.com > Cc:
office@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [office] Re: URL to the XSLT being used to transform ODT 1.3 to HTML specification Dear TC members after 13 days I suspect the XSLT was taken directly from the LibreOffice that was installed on the editor's machine. Am I suspecting right? I am asking as I would like to compare that XSLT version used to create the ODF 1.3 HTML with the versions I have in my personal archive and I had been used for ODF 1.2. Otherwise, I will compare my version with the latest version of LibreOffice. The reason for the comparison are several regressions, that I have observed: Missing paragraph border Missing space in between heading text and heading number Untypical margin/padding of paragraphs Finally, I would like to write a script to remove the random ID of the content table (first below) and only use the methodical ID that is being inserted (second below, for instance, the following two URLs point to the same <table:table-cell> declaration:
https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/cs01/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-cs01-part3-schema.html#__RefHeading__1415590_253892949 https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/cs01/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-cs01-part3-schema.html#element-table_table-cell Best regards, Svante Am Do., 14. Mai 2020 um 11:56 Uhr schrieb Svante Schubert <
svante.schubert@gmail.com >: Dear ODF editors, Could you please point me to the location of the latest / currently used XSL transformation stylesheets of the ODT 1.3 to HTML specification? Thanks in advance, Svante -- Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog):
http://tm.durusau.net Homepage:
http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau -- Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net Technical Advisory Board, OASIS (TAB) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog):
http://tm.durusau.net Homepage:
http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau