UBL Naming and Design Rules SC

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 82

    Posted 07-17-2003 02:23
    >>[R 82]   UBL documents must use the same legal characters in XML character
    >>data that are listed in the XML Recommendation.  Including tab, carriage
    >>return, line feed, and the legal characters of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646.
    
    Minor editorial amendment suggestion:
    
    [R 82]   UBL documents must use the same set of accepted characters in 
    as those listed in the XML Recommendation, including tab, carriage
    return, line feed, and the defined characters of Unicode and
    ISO/IEC 10646.
    
    
    I'm not still happy with my own suggestion, as I think the portion
    saying "including tab, carriage return, ..."  seems to imply
    that they're not part of character set accepted in XML Recommendation.
    
    The primary change here is to avoid the word "legal" in this
    context, and reserving "legal" to mean the real legality issues
    surrounding business transactions using UBL.
    
    
    Best Regards,
    Chin Chee-Kai
    SoftML
    Tel: +65-6820-2979
    Fax: +65-6743-7875
    Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
    http://SoftML.Net/
    
    
    On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
    
    >>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
    >>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
    >>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
    >>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
    >>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
    >>
    >>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
    >>
    >>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 18, 2003
    >>
    >>*******************************
    >>[R 82]   UBL documents must use the same legal characters in XML character
    >>data that are listed in the XML Recommendation.  Including tab, carriage
    >>return, line feed, and the legal characters of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646.
    >>
    >>
    >>ATG Decision:  rule has not yet been discussed by ATG2
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>---
    >>
    >>File has not been scanned
    >>
    >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    >>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003