OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC

Re: [ebxml-msg] Oct 13th Agenda & Draft

  • 1.  Re: [ebxml-msg] Oct 13th Agenda & Draft

    Posted 10-22-2004 13:36
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ebxml-msg message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Oct 13th Agenda & Draft


    We would greatly appreciate your input. I was planning on completing the
    pull messaging section soon. However, I would still appreciate any input or
    feedback I can get. If you can make next Wednesday's call we can add an
    agenda item to discuss the pull messaging section. Cheers!
    
    
    
    Jeff Turpin
    Cyclone Commerce, Inc.
    
    
    > From: "iwasa" <kiwasa@jp.fujitsu.com>
    > Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:09:56 +0900
    > To: "ebXML Messaging" <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>, "Matthew MacKenzie"
    > <mattm@adobe.com>
    > Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Oct 13th Agenda & Draft
    > 
    > Hi Matthew and all,
    > 
    > The section 10.6 Reliable Messaging Module in the
    > latest draft looks good so far. We may need to define
    > a format of PullAcknowledgment Signal.
    > I believe it is similer, if it is not exactly the same,
    > with the Aknowledgment message of WS-Reliability.
    > 
    > By the way, I have some questions.
    > Is somebody working for section 10.5 Pull module?
    > It looks like we need more texts for this section.
    > 
    > I'm interested in this module to be written soon,
    > since there is a strong demand from our customers
    > for this function. And if we have this section
    > written enough, it makes me easy to convince our
    > customers to adopt ebMS 3.0.
    > 
    > I personally can volunteer to draft a pull messaging
    > specification to initiate a discussion, if it helps to
    > speed up the process. I'm also fine if someone is
    > going to write the text soon for review. I would
    > like to know the current status for this section.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > 
    > Iwasa
    > Fujitsu Limited
    > 
    >