+1
Cliff Collins wrote:
> In my opinion:
>
> For ping, pong, StatusRequest and StatusResponse the spec says to Soap fault
> with a code of "MustUnderstand" (section 8, line 1790) but this doesn't seem
> to be very meaningful. These type of messages will not be specified as
> "supported" in a CPA and there is nothing in the ebXML message that any
> ebXML MSH could not parse since the "unsupported" part will be on the action
> value and not a new element. Given that a MSH has to explicitly look at the
> action to decide if it supports this, I think a error list of "NotSupported"
> makes for much better MSH error handling verses a soap fault. Especially, if
> the Ping/StatusRequest requests an async response.
>
> I think we should still have an errorcode of NotSupported used for these
> types of MSH messages that are not required to be implemented by an MSH.
>
> Cliff
>
> >