Hi all, I updated the agenda earlier today to add protocol naming, versions and elements of the connect message. While MQTT is well established as a protocol name, there are inconsistent references to a full meaning for each letter. Indeed a 'full meaning' may not even be deemed necessary. Either way, it's for the TC to agree the name of the protocol. It would be helpful if members consider this and bring any preferred options to the call on Thursday. Email discussion welcome! I don't propose we challenge the name of TC itself since it's largely transient in delivering a standardised MQTT. More information from OASIS on naming available here >
http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives.html < Best Regards Richard Coppen Software Engineer WebSphere MQ Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU