OASIS Emergency Management TC

Re: [emergency] RE: A view from Australia on dealing with emergencies.

  • 1.  Re: [emergency] RE: A view from Australia on dealing with emergencies.

    Posted 09-29-2005 20:38
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [emergency] RE: A view from Australia on dealing with emergencies.


    Carl -
    
    All-Hazards was the paradigm for U.S. emergency management from Mt.  
    Saint Helens until 9/11.  It got lost amid the New Sentimentalism  
    that swept the nation after the 9/11 attacks, just as FEMA got lost  
    within DHS.
    
    - Art
    
    On Sep 29, 2005, at 4:15 PM, Carl Reed OGC Account wrote:
    
    > I recently attended and presented at a workshop is Australia titled  
    > Geospatial Support to the National "All Hazards" Counter-Terrorism,  
    > Emergency. By way of background, after 9-11, and convened with  
    > greater urgency as a result of the Bali bombings, the Australian  
    > Government invited representatives from key United States emergency  
    > management organizations involved in the response to the September  
    > 11 incident were invited to lead a series of ‘Lessons Learnt’  
    > Executive Breakfasts and Workshops around Australia in March 2003.  
    > The results of these workshops can be found in a document located  
    > athttp://www.ema.gov.au/agd/EMA/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/ 
    > (63F21BC6A4528BAE4CED2F9930C45677)~EMALessonsLearntbookletfinal.pdf/ 
    > $file/EMALessonsLearntbookletfinal.pdf .
    >
    > One of the key recommendations that arose from these workshops and  
    > has since become and integral component of EM and Preparedness in  
    > Australia is something called the  'All hazards' approach.  
    > Basically, this approach is to develop preparedness and response  
    > plans that incorporate the 'all hazards' approach - really one plan  
    > that can be activated with the flexibility to be adapted to all  
    > incidents.
    >
    > This policy is captured in the 2004 Emergency Management Act. The  
    > Emergency Management Act 2004 establishes a framework for the  
    > management of emergencies. Its major parts deal with:
    > the State Emergency Management Committee (SEMC) - establishment,  
    > membership, functions and powers, including the power to create  
    > advisory groups
    > co-ordination - through the Commissioner of Police, as State Co- 
    > ordinator, and assistants
    > the management of emergencies, including:
    > their classification as major incidents, major emergencies or  
    > disasters
    > recovery operations.
    > The Act replaces the State Disaster Act 1980, and is consistent  
    > with the Government's policy on emergency management, protective  
    > security and counter-terrorism. It shifts the focus from 'disaster  
    > management' to a flexible 'all hazards' framework that applies to  
    > planning, coordination and control for any emergency.
    >
    > Their philosophy is to treat all emergencies the same in terms of  
    > policy, jurisdictional relationships, partnerships, agreements,  
    > communications, information sharing, and so forth. There are  
    > obviously response hardware differences according to the event  
    > type, such as required for radiation versus fire versus a bomb  
    > threat. However, the policies and procedures - the plan - are  
    > almost identical for all event types.
    >
    > I am not sure how similar or dissimilar this approach is from what  
    > DHS is doing. However, they Aussies are a bit mystified by what  
    > appears to be a fragmented approach in the US.
    >
    > Carl Reed, PhD
    > CTO and Executive Director Specification Program
    > OGC
    >
    > The OGC: Helping the World to Communicate Geographically
    >
    > ---------------------
    >
    > This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use  
    > of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or  
    > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any  
    > use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly  
    > prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify  
    > the sender  immediately by return email and delete this  
    > communication and destroy all copies.
    >
    > "The important thing is not to stop questioning." -- Albert Einstein
    >
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]