MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















ebxml-msg message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Deadline




From: "Lund, Brad" <brad.lund@intel.com>
To: 'Cliff Collins' <collinsc@sybase.com>,"Miller, Robert (GXS)" <Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com>,David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>,"Ian. C. Jones (E-mail)" <ian.c.jones@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:24:54 -0800









+1+1
 
brad

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Cliff Collins 
  [mailto:collinsc@sybase.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:22 
  AM
To: Miller, Robert (GXS); David Fischer; Ian. C. Jones 
  (E-mail)
Cc: ebXML Msg
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] 
  Deadline


  
+1
  
 
  
Cliff
  

    
-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Robert (GXS) 
    [mailto:Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 
    2002 9:02 AM
To: David Fischer; Ian. C. Jones 
    (E-mail)
Cc: ebXML Msg
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] 
    Deadline


    
I 
    agree with David's response to comment deadlines and to the specification as 
    voted.
    
 
    
Cheers,
    
            
    Bob
    

      
-----Original Message-----
From: David Fischer 
      [mailto:david@drummondgroup.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 
      9:06 PM
To: Ian. C. Jones (E-mail)
Cc: ebXML 
      Msg
Subject: [ebxml-msg] Deadline


      
Ian,
      
 
      
I 
      seemed to be hearing on the call today that unless we include these late 
      comments, the spec would be somehow flawed and not fit for public 
      release?  I feel a little insulted, as should the 25 members who 
      voted for the spec.  Why are we assuming the spec will be better for 
      these comments?  We have worked hard on this spec and we have slipped 
      deadlines several times to allow sufficient comment period.  We have 
      produced a superior product and we should recognize it as 
      such.
      
 
      
Today, we indicated a comment deadline of Jan 18?  
      Today was not a voting meeting and there was not a quorum.  On Dec 3 
      we voted and approved a deadline of Jan 11.  We confirmed that 
      deadline again on Dec 17.  On Jan 22 we agreed to vote on 
      clarifications, but we did not change any deadlines and we specifically 
      did not accept "errata on items received or implementation 
      experience".
      
 
      
Our 
      deadline is already in the minutes of previous meetings and we should not 
      consider anything after that date (or we will fail to 
      submit this quarter too).  Our consideration should be to 
      anything submitted before that date.
      
 
      
 
      
 
      
Regards,
      
 
      
David Fischer
      
Drummond 
Group.












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]


  









Powered by eList eXpress LLC