It is in addition to. This proposal is to address a specific issue that has been causing problems. Mark's proposal introduces important new functionality. They are closely related but actually independent of each other. Anthony On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Featherstone, David <
David.Featherstone@safenet-inc.com > wrote: Anthony Is your proposal “ in addition to ” or “ instead of ” the WrapUnwrap.pptx proposal from Mark Joseph? Cheers, … Dave From:
kmip@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:
kmip@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Anthony Berglas Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 3:37 AM To:
kmip@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [kmip] Groups - Get Key Wrap Type uploaded Submitter's message Hello All, Mark and I have been thinking about the long outstanding problem that getting a key that was registered wrapped produces inconsistent behaviors from different vendor's servers. The uploaded proposal simply provides an additional parameter which lets the client specify what it wants. All feedback most welcome. I would like to discuss it on this week's call. Anthony -- Anthony Berglas Document Name : Get Key Wrap Type Description A simple proposal to address the long outstanding problem that getting a key that was registered wrapped produces inconsistent behaviors in different vendor's servers. Download Latest Revision Public Download Link Submitter : Anthony Berglas Group : OASIS Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP) TC Folder : Proposals Date submitted : 2015-12-01 00:36:51 The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or disclosing it. -- Anthony Berglas Ph.D. Principal Engineer
Anthony.Berglas@Cryptsoft.com