MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















wsia message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [wsrp][wsia][wsrp-wsia joint interfaces][Draft Spec 0.43] Sha	redTransient Information




From: Carsten Leue <cleue@de.ibm.com>
To: Gil Tayar <Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 08:49:24 +0200






I would agree to that. "Shared Transient Information" would introduce a lot
of additional problems especially when introducing parallel rendering. In
this case a special locking mechanism would have to be defined to avoid
inconsistent session state.


Best regards
Carsten Leue

-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory B�blingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401



|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           Gil Tayar        |
|         |           <Gil.Tayar@webcol|
|         |           lage.com>        |
|         |                            |
|         |           05/22/2002 05:31 |
|         |           PM               |
|         |           Please respond to|
|         |           Gil Tayar        |
|         |                            |
|---------+---------------------------->
  >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                                                     |
  |       To:       wsia@lists.oasis-open.org, wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org                                                                |
  |       cc:                                                                                                                           |
  |       Subject:  RE: [wsrp][wsia][wsrp-wsia joint interfaces][Draft Spec 0.43] Sha       red Transient Information                   |
  |                                                                                                                                     |
  |                                                                                                                                     |
  >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|



I agree. If nobody objects, I will remove the "Shared Transient
Information"
sections to a "future directions" place in the document, which will leave
us
with "User Transient Information" and "Persistent Information".

Gil