OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC

RE: [xliff] Revised Committee Draft XLIFF 1.2 Spec

  • 1.  RE: [xliff] Revised Committee Draft XLIFF 1.2 Spec

    Posted 05-10-2006 09:17
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    xliff message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [xliff] Revised Committee Draft XLIFF 1.2 Spec


    Hi all,

    Regarding point 5) below I would like to clarify that the segmentation markup is entirely optional and does not affect the functionality of the files as XLIFF files. The filter will ignore the segment boundaries when back-converting to the native format, and thus the entire content of the <target> element will be used, including content appearing outside of segments.

    The segmentation markup is intended for tools such as translation memories to optimize recycling of previously translated content, and as such it often makes more sense to not include spaces between sentences in the segments (though that is entirely up to the tools). This does not in any way prevent users from editing the content between the segments, removing spaces or adding additional ones as needed. In fact it is fully allowed (and may frequently happen) that only part of the translated content in the <target> element is part of segments.

    The example in point 5) attempts to explicitly show this by not including the space characters in the segments (which normally gives better re-use when applying a TM). Perhaps we need to clarify the text in the specification to make that more explicit?

    Cheers,

    Magnus


    From: Tony Jewtushenko [mailto:tony.jewtushenko@productinnovator.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:41 PM
    To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: [xliff] Revised Committee Draft XLIFF 1.2 Spec

    I've revised the spec to address the issues raised by Rudolfo,  although three issues remain open as they require additional input from the TC.  I've also corrected a couple of minor problems with the spec HTML in order to certify spec as HTML 4.01 compliant. And additionally, the spec includes a number of minor corrections to typos as was kindly reported by Asgeir Frimannsson.

     

    Asgeir also flagged a minor issue with the XSD's that will require a revision,  so the spec distribution package will need to be reissued once fixed documents are produced.

     

    Below are the original emails and actions taken.  I would appreciate feedback on the remaining open issues as we need to close these issues down by the end of the week in order to complete any required revisions before Tuesday's TC teleconference.

     

    Regards,

    Tony