OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC

Hello,

sorry for sending a comment after the review closed.

When editing an XLIFF file by hand I realized that file

<xliff version="2.1" xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:document:2.0"
srcLang="" trgLang="">
<file id="f1">
<unit id="u1">
<segment id="s1">
test
<target>test</target>
</segment>
</unit>
</file>
</xliff>

does not report any error when validated against schemas. Note the
*srcLang="" trgLang=""*.

The root cause seems to be in xliff_core_2.0.xsd:
<xs:attribute name="srcLang" use="required"/>
<xs:attribute name="trgLang" use="optional"/>
where type is not defined.

Could you please have a look?

Thanks,
Jan

Hello Jano,

great thanks for taking the time and reviewing the csprd02 of XLIFF Vesrion
2.1

On behalf of the XLIFF TC, I created this issue
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-46
from your comment.
Please follow the resolution/disposal of your comment on the above address

In case you want to follow up on the comment resolution please continue
this conversation that is referenced from the JIRA issue under the
following markmail link
*http://markmail.org/thread/rwrux7w4q27isk5i
<http://markmail.org/thread/rwrux7w4q27isk5i>*

The TC plans to resolve your comment in the TC meeting on 7th March 2017
and reflect the resulting changes in a new working draft by 15th March,
2017.


Cheers and thanks again



Dr. David Filip
===========
OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair
OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer
Spokes Research Fellow
ADAPT Centre
KDEG, Trinity College Dublin
Mobile: +420-777-218-122


On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Ján Husarcík <jan.husarcik@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> sorry for sending a comment after the review closed.
>
> When editing an XLIFF file by hand I realized that file
>
> <xliff version="2.1" xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:document:2.0"
> srcLang="" trgLang="">
> <file id="f1">
> <unit id="u1">
> <segment id="s1">
> test
> <target>test</target>
> </segment>
> </unit>
> </file>
> </xliff>
>
> does not report any error when validated against schemas. Note the
> *srcLang="" trgLang=""*.
>
> The root cause seems to be in xliff_core_2.0.xsd:
> <xs:attribute name="srcLang" use="required"/>
> <xs:attribute name="trgLang" use="optional"/>
> where type is not defined.
>
> Could you please have a look?
>
> Thanks,
> Jan
>

Hello Jano, great thanks for taking the time and reviewing the csprd02 of XLIFF Vesrion 2.1 On behalf of the XLIFF TC, I created this issue https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-46 from your comment. Please follow the resolution/disposal of your comment on the above address In case you want to follow up on the comment resolution please continue this conversation that is referenced from the JIRA issue under the following markmail link http://markmail.org/thread/rwrux7w4q27isk5i The TC plans to resolve your comment in the TC meeting on 7th March 2017 and reflect the resulting changes in a new working draft by 15th March, 2017. Cheers and thanks again Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Ján Husarcík < jan.husarcik@gmail.com > wrote: Hello, sorry for sending a comment after the review closed. When editing an XLIFF file by hand I realized that file <xliff version="2.1" xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc: xliff:document:2.0" srcLang="" trgLang="">     <file id="f1">         <unit id="u1">             <segment id="s1">                 <source>test</source>                 <target>test</target>             </segment>         </unit>     </file> </xliff> does not report any error when validated against schemas. Note the *srcLang="" trgLang=""*. The root cause seems to be in xliff_core_2.0.xsd: <xs:attribute name="srcLang" use="required"/> <xs:attribute name="trgLang" use="optional"/> where type is not defined. Could you please have a look? Thanks, Jan