MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
emergency message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: Quick Update on EDXL DE
Rex and others,
Thanks so much for the diligence that you all applied to getting the EDXL
-DE to this point. I was on travel most of this week and got behind. It
seems the outstanding issue has to do with the difference of opinion
between David and Renato on what appears to be a substantive change to the
EDXL-DE that would require another comment period. I would like to remind
every one that this comment period could be only 15 days rather than the
60- days. This is something that I would like for us to vote on at the
next meeting. Let's make sure that only technical soundness drives this,
so we can be as thorough as possible when this goes out. We made the
decision last month that we were not going to try to rush this through but
let us certainly focus on it now and decide wether to make this change or
not and go forward.
As for the next meeting, I for one will not be able to make the meeting
time next Tues, Dec 13. I would like to move this meeting to Dec 14 at the
same time. Please reply back if this is a problem for you. Also, if
someone would like to volunteer a toll free telecon line, I would
appreciate it. If I haven't heard from anyone by a couple of hours before
the meeting, I'll get another line and post the number on the site.
Thanks again for all the work you do to promote emergency management standards,
Elysa Jones, Chair
OASIS EM-TC
Engineering Program Manager
Warning Systems, Inc.
256-880-8702 x102
256-694-8702 cell
At 09:16 AM 12/7/2005, Rex Brooks wrote:
>Hi Elysa,
>
>We got through most of the outstanding issues and should have the spec
>harmonized up to this with the schema in lockstep as much as is possible.
>Patti Got the spec out last night, bless her. However, it still will need
>to be gone over with a fine tooth comb.That couldn't have been easy after
>a two and a half hour meeting.
>
>We have one outstanding issue which the whole TC will have to discuss but
>we have gone through the last issues list and the spec and Dave's comments
>from yesterday. It involves namespacing xmlContent and I am not even going
>to try to describe it completely. Hopefully someone will offer a summary.
>I have a meeting to get to, but I wanted to send you an update.
>
>However, It is highly unlikely that we would be able to make our deadline
>for this month, even if we could get a quorum today, which would be
>difficult since I, myself have a full day laid out ahead of me. We also
>decided to stay put with the area issue, pending someone or the GIS SC
>coming forward with an actual proposal. Its a can of worms, and perhaps
>after I get a few more things done to catch up from my bout of pneumonia,
>I can devote some time to it, but I'm not promising anything before we
>finish up v1.0. At best it could be a 1.1 proposal from me, since anything
>in this arena that has half a chance will also have to have a boatload of
>supporters to do more than muddy up the already roiling waters around this
>issue.
>
>Ciao,
>Rex
>--
>Rex Brooks
>President, CEO
>Starbourne Communications Design
>GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
>Berkeley, CA 94702
>Tel: 510-849-2309
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]