Paul, really appreciate you getting us this additional review, thanks so much. As unpleasant as it was to materialize at the last minute, it seems to me that the address design is greatly improved by this
last minute tinkering.
Thanks again. It s good to ship. Whew. Congratulations to all of us and thank you to everyone for all the hard work along the way. I m deeply grateful to all of you, and glad to have been a part of this experience.
Michael
From: Paul Anderson <
paul@grammatech.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 6:42 PM
To: Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc) <
v-lgold@microsoft.com>; James Kupsch <
kupsch@cs.wisc.edu>; Michael Fanning <
Michael.Fanning@microsoft.com>; OASIS SARIF TC Discussion List <
sarif@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [sarif] #401: Improved design of address object design
Awesome. Thanks!
On 4/30/2019 9:35 PM, Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc) wrote:
Thank you Paul, I'm glad it meets your needs.
Jim spotted the missing word as well, and it's fixed in the version that will go out for ballot in the morning.
Best regards,
Larry
Get
Outlook for Android
From: Paul Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [sarif] #401: Improved design of address object design
To: Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc), James Kupsch, Michael Fanning, OASIS SARIF TC Discussion List
Larry:
I'm on travel, but I asked Tom Johnson here to confirm that the recent
changes in this area will be good for our needs. He replied yes, but
spotted a typo. See the attached.
Best,
-Paul
On 4/29/2019 5:51 PM, Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc) wrote:
> Got it
>
>
Original Message-----
> From: James Kupsch
<kupsch@cs.wisc.edu>
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 2:50 PM
> To: Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc)
<v-lgold@microsoft.com> ; Michael Fanning
<Michael.Fanning@microsoft.com> ; OASIS SARIF TC Discussion List
<sarif@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Subject: Re: [sarif] #401: Improved design of address object design
>
> If length is negative, then it is downwards growing. If it is positive, then it is upwards growing. If it is null then it is unknown as it is just an address not a region.
>
> Jim
>
>
> On 4/29/19 4:46 PM, Larry Golding (Myriad Consulting Inc) wrote:
>> Oh good heavens, but that means that a negative offsetFromParent might not signal a downward-growing structure, so I can't write (as I already have) that "a negative value SHALL mean that
the data structure grows from higher addresses towards lower addresses".
>>
>> So what constraints _can_ I put on length/offsetFromParent/relative address, and what _is_ the reliable signal that I have a downward growing structure?
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>