MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->





















emergency message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: [sia-pilot6] [emergency] EDXL-DE routing andvalueListUrn




From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
To: "Carl Reed OGC Account" <creed@opengeospatial.org>,       "SIA Pilot-6" <sia-pilot6@humanml.cim3.net>,       <emergency@lists.oasis-open.org>, "Rex Brooks" <rexb@starbourne.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:48:41 -0800






Yup.

At 10:14 AM -0700 3/21/06, Carl Reed OGC Account wrote:
>What he said . . .
>
>And this also gets to the issue we discussed in the IF SC call 
>today. There is considerable misunderstanding and need for education 
>in the market place regarding the use and implementation of EDXL. 
>Part of this education is that EDXL is a transport mechanism and 
>must/can be viewed as independent from the technology implementation 
>infrastructure. It should not matter if the enterprise (in the 
>virtual sense) is implementing against a middleware bus, using 
>SOAP/WSDL/UDDI, using ebRIM/XML, using an OGC Catalog, using the 
>COMCARE EPAD application, using Java enterprise beans, etc. I view 
>EDXL as technology implementation neutral - as it should be.
>
>Am I wrong in thinking this?
>
>Also, my previous email was more about making sure that the 
>discussions in the EM TC on EDXL do not totally go totally US 
>DHS/DoD centric. I understand the immediate requirement but we 
>cannot loose sight of the bigger picture. For example, I would love 
>to be able to recommend EDXL to ORCHESTRA in Europe.
>
>Cheers
>
>Carl
>
>