Hi,
This looks fascinating, but wouldn't there be a lot of overlap with XRI
Data Interchange Technical Committee (XDI TC)? XDI is developing a
mechanism that may achieve all of the goals of the charter as I
understood it, at first pass. I haven't done a write up of a detailed
comparison yet though. I'd like to first provide the XDI charter for
reading
( http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xdi/charter.php ) and request one
of the SET TC sponsors to let me know how to end-goals are different
from XDI?
Thanks,
Bill Barnhill
Booz Allen Hamilton
XDI TC Co-Chair, OASIS TAB member
________________________________
From: carl mattocks
Sent: Tue 5/13/2008 11:07 AM
To: Eckenfels. Bernd
Cc: oasis-charter-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [oasis-charter-discuss] Re: Proposed Charter for OASIS SET
TC
I agree with the statement "SET Process and Semantic Model" would be
easily applicable to legacy formants, EDI or Inhouse ..
However, I believe a semantic domain scoped by UBL / CCTS is an
excellent and pragmatic goal for the first version of a SET.
highest regards
carl
On 5/13/08, Eckenfels. Bernd