I am going back through Rules already discussed and building a status list.
The following rules, that I am sending out are all commented on, but not
decided. Though the comments are not always for or against, mostly
editorial. So, same rules apply. You have 5 working days, which actually
puts us in Montreal.
Rules for Voting: Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it. The
membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
Voting period on this rule ends: July 28, 2003
*******************************
[R 18] If the object class term would have been helpful in the resulting
XML name for clarity, or if needed to differentiate the element and allow it
to have a different type association, it should be repeated in the property
qualifier field.
Our Comments:
Group together like rules, Complex-types together, elements together, etc.
Change to:
"The object class term may be repeated in the property qualifier field,
where it is deemed helpful for reasons of either XML naming clarity or if
needed to differentiate the element and allow it to have a different type
association."
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Seaburg;Lisa
FN:Lisa Seaburg (E-mail)
ORG:Aeon LLC
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(662) 562-7676
ADR;WORK:;;;Senatobia;MS;38668;USA
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Senatobia, MS 38668=0D=0AUSA
URL;WORK:http://www.aeon-llc.com
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:lseaburg@aeon-llc.com
REV:20030721T171646Z
END:VCARD