OASIS Emergency Management TC

  • 1.  Emergency Management TC IPR Transition Ballot

    Posted 09-18-2006 19:35
    To: Those OASIS member voting representatives and individual members who are
    voting "TC Qualified Members" for the Emergency Management TC
     
       As you probably know, OASIS adopted revisions to our IPR Policy effective on
    15 April 2005.[1] TCs formed before that date continue to operate under the old
    ("legacy") policy. However, they may convert to the new policy by making a
    "transition" under the terms of the OASIS IPR Transition Policy [2], by the
    specific voting procedure described in the transition policy.
     
       The OASIS Emergency Management TC has notified OASIS staff that it
    successfully conducted a Transition Request vote under the IPR Transition
    Policy, to select the "RF/RAND" IPR Mode. Accordingly, I am opening a Transition
    Approval Ballot, in which the primary representatives of all voting members of
    the committee may cast a ballot. A list of the current TC voting members, as of
    the date of the Transition Request, is attached. In this ballot, which will run
    for 14 days, the TC Qualified Members [3] each may cast only a single vote. The
    ballot will allow for YES, NO, or ABSTAIN votes. Approval of a Transition
    Approval Ballot requires:
       (i) a minimum of 50% of all TC Qualified Members to vote,
       (ii) no NO votes cast, and
       (iii) one or more YES votes.
     
       The ballot has opened and can be seen at [4]. Please note, for organizational
    members, it is the primary OASIS representative who votes, so if you are not a
    TC member, you may wish to consult your organization's active TC members
    regarding this vote.
     
       We will notify the Emergency Management TC list and the voting "TC Qualified
    Members" of the results.
     
    Regards,
     
    Mary McRae
    Manager of TC Administration, OASIS
    email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
     
    [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php 
    [2] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/ipr_transition_policy.php 
    [3] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/members/roster.php
       In the transition policy, the "TC Qualified Members" who may vote in this
    ballot are defined as: "either a TC Individual Voting Member or an OASIS
    Organizational Member that has at least one voting member in the TC at the time
    the TC Individual Voting Members approve the Transition Request and has signed
    the new Membership Agreement."
    [4] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/voting/ballot.php?id=1112
     
    
    TC Voting Member    Qualified Member    Primary Representative
    Organizational Members:
    
    Disaster Management Interoperability Servi... 
    Tim Grapes              yes
    Gary Ham                yes             Gary Ham
    
    ESI Acquisition
    Josh Shows              yes             Nadia Butler
    
    IEM
    Patti Aymond            yes             Patti Aymond
    
    Lockheed Martin
    Tom Merkle              yes             Sameer Sharma
    
    Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. (OGC)
    Carl Reed               yes             Carl Reed
    
    Warning Systems Inc
    Elysa Jones             yes             Elysa Jones
    
    Individual/Associate Members:
    
    Sukumar Dwarkanath      yes             Sukumar Dwarkanath
    Art Botterell           yes             Art Botterell
    David Ellis             yes             David Ellis
    Aaron Temin             yes             Aaron Temin
    
    
    


  • 2.  Re: [emergency] Emergency Management TC IPR Transition Ballot

    Posted 09-19-2006 13:26
    
    On 19 Sep 2006, at 05:34, Mary McRae wrote:
    
    >    The OASIS Emergency Management TC has notified OASIS staff that it
    > successfully conducted a Transition Request vote under the IPR  
    > Transition
    > Policy, to select the "RF/RAND" IPR Mode.
    
    For the record, can someone please indicate where in the email  
    archives/minutes
    that this decision was made?
    
    My next question is, why wasn't the "RF on Limited Terms" selected?
    This gives the maximum freedom to implementors.
    
    Cheers...  Renato Iannella
    National ICT Australia (NICTA)
    
    
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
    privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
    use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
    recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
    messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
    data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
    amendment. This notice should not be removed.