> minutes of 6-5 > > participants: konstantin, don, anne, polar, ernesto, simon, carlisle > > 1. F2F minutes approval > > Raw minutes of the Milan F2F produced by Simon will be appended to the > current minutes written by Carlisle and others. > > 2. XACML context definition > > Following previous discussions, Simon illustrates the first part of his > proposal for a XACML context. After a thorough discussion it is decided that > it will be partly modified, using the base URI of a resource as the holder > of a resource property (e.g. a part of its content) and putting it in the > resource part. > Besides modifying the proposal accordingly, Simon and Michiharu will > complete it and hopefully present a preliminary definition of the XACML > context on May 13th concall. > It is also agreed that Ernesto will send out a note to the whole XACML > group, pointing out the fact that the Schema subgroup is going ahead with > the XACML context definition and reminding everyone that a final decision on > whether to adopt a context or not needs to be be taken on the 16th. > > 3. Attribute designators > > 3.1 Carlisle illustrates the current AttributeDesignator structure. > Simon proposes the AttributeLocator attribute to be a XPath expression into > XACML context. AttributeLocator should not include the URI of the logical > XML document containing the context itself. > The URI logical document containing the context would be specified under the > resource portion of the XACML context, in a new ResourceLocation attribute. > This proposal is left as an open issue. > > 3.2 Different techniques qualification of attribute names were discussed, it > was decided to look into SAML technique and to compare it with > straightforward namespace qualification. > Qualification is left as an open issue. > > > 4. Schema Sub Committee Activity planning > > Next concall will be used for closing Policy/Rule discussion. People are > invited to post opinions to the list. > Separately we shall start discussion on the predicate structure, taking into > account the context proposal made by Michiharu and Simon. > Specifically next concalls' agenda should be the following: > > 13 May 2002, 10AM (US ET) Policy/Rule + start discussion on predicate > 20 May 2002, 10AM (US ET) Predicate expression/predicates taking context > into account > 27 May 2002, 10AM (US ET) Obligations/Functions > > This would lead us to conclude our work in time for the June 1st deadline >